Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10059-013-0113-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMDA Receptor as a Newly Identified Member of the Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Family: Clinical Implications for Neurodegenerative Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is hypothesized that circulating BCAAs could have an important role in glutamate synthesis and could also buffer toxic levels of glutamate [ 35 ]. Glutamate is the most abundant excitatory neurotransmitter and binds to cell surface receptors like α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors [ 36 ]. Because N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor hypofunction seems to be related to calcium ion dysregulation and impaired synaptic plasticity [ 37 ], it is possible that the association of reduced levels of BCAA to dementia and AD is mediated through this pathway [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hypothesized that circulating BCAAs could have an important role in glutamate synthesis and could also buffer toxic levels of glutamate [ 35 ]. Glutamate is the most abundant excitatory neurotransmitter and binds to cell surface receptors like α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors [ 36 ]. Because N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor hypofunction seems to be related to calcium ion dysregulation and impaired synaptic plasticity [ 37 ], it is possible that the association of reduced levels of BCAA to dementia and AD is mediated through this pathway [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters of ion conductance are largely regulated by amino acid signaling motifs in the aminoterminal domain (NTD) and transmembrane domains (TMDs). However, NMDARs also operate in calcium-independent ways to regulate neuronal plasticity (Birnbaum, Bali, Rajendran, Nitsch, & Tackenberg, 2015; Chung, 2013; Nabavi et al, 2013; Vissel, Krupp, Heinemann & Westbrook, 2001; Li et al, 2016; Stein, Gray, & Zito, 2015; Dore et al, 2017). Glutamate binding to NMDARs can produce signals in the postsynaptic neuron in the absence of calcium conductance, via direct protein-protein interactions mediated by the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of the GluN2 subunits (Sanz-Clemente, Nicoll, & Roche, 2013; Blanke & VanDongen, 2009; Maki, Aman, Amico-Ruvio, Kussius & Popescru, 2012; Dore & Malinow, 2015; Dore, Aow, & Malinow, 2016; Aow, Dore & Malinow, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been thought for a long time that the levels of Ca 2+ influx through NMDARs determine the induction of either LTP (high Ca 2+ influx or LTD (mild Ca 2+ influx). 12 Nevertheless, a recent study showed that Ca 2+ flux is not essential for the induction of NMDAR-LTD, whereas glutamate binding to the receptor is required. 13 NMDAR signaling independently of ion flux has already been proposed to regulate NMDAR phosphorylation and endocytosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%