2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11064-013-0987-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMDA Receptor Activation: Two Targets for Two Co-Agonists

Abstract: Neuronal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) play a critical role in synaptic plasticity. Their activation requires not only binding of their ligand glutamate and membrane depolarization but also the presence of a co-agonist, glycine or D-serine. An increasing body of experimental evidence suggests that different populations of NMDARs could be gated by different co-agonists. Here we discuss how the spatial distribution of co-agonist sources and uptake mechanisms, together with diffusional properties of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative difference in co-agonist use by S-NMDARs and E-NMDARs might be explained by the differential localization of NR2A and NR2B subunits, respectively, as NR2B-containing receptors have a tenfold higher affinity for glycine than NR2A-containing receptors [70,86]. Similarly, the localized release and astrocytic uptake of these coagonists has also been hypothesized to explain the differences in co-agonist use by S-NMDARs vs. ENMDARs (see [87,88] for review). Further work is needed in this area, as a better understanding of the role of NMDAR co-agonists may have therapeutic implications.…”
Section: Synaptic Vs Extrasynaptic Nmdarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative difference in co-agonist use by S-NMDARs and E-NMDARs might be explained by the differential localization of NR2A and NR2B subunits, respectively, as NR2B-containing receptors have a tenfold higher affinity for glycine than NR2A-containing receptors [70,86]. Similarly, the localized release and astrocytic uptake of these coagonists has also been hypothesized to explain the differences in co-agonist use by S-NMDARs vs. ENMDARs (see [87,88] for review). Further work is needed in this area, as a better understanding of the role of NMDAR co-agonists may have therapeutic implications.…”
Section: Synaptic Vs Extrasynaptic Nmdarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Astrocytes are multifunctional brain cells that have been implicated in a wide array of important brain functions, including the provision of trophic factors, structural and metabolic support to neurons (Molofsky et al, ; Tsai et al, ; Clarke and Barres, ; Sloan and Barres, ), regulation of vascular tone (Filosa et al, ; Kim et al, ), neurovascular coupling (Attwell et al, ; Petzold and Murthy, ; Otsu et al, ), ion and transmitter clearance (Rose and Karus, ; Sibille et al, , ; Tong et al, ; Murphy‐Royal et al, ), and direct communication with neurons via gliotransmission (Jourdain et al, ; Henneberger et al, ; Shigetomi et al, ; Araque et al, ). Astrocyte interactions with neural elements are important for normal brain development, ongoing function, and plasticity, although many specific mechanistic hypotheses remain controversial (Agulhon et al, ; Petravicz et al, ; Srinivasan et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the brain, the endogenous NMDAR coagonist is either d -serine or glycine, with one or the other gating receptors in a nonredundant manner (Henneberger et al 2010, 2013; Kalbaugh et al 2009; Li et al 2009, 2013; Le Bail et al 2015; Meunier et al 2016; Mothet et al 2000; Papouin et al 2012). We investigated coagonist identity within spinal networks by selectively depleting endogenous d -serine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%