1992
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199212000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMDA antagonists disrupt timing behaviour in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the 5-CSRT and DRL24 tasks. In particular, we were interested in examining the influence of these 5-HT antagonists in combination with the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine, which clearly impairs performance in such tasks (Welzl et al 1989;Sanger 1992;Stephens and Cole 1996;Higgins et al 2003). For the 5-CSRTT experiments, we also included the novel NR2B subunit-selective antagonist Ro 63-1908 (Gill et al 2002), which has a particularly striking effect on premature responding in this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the 5-CSRT and DRL24 tasks. In particular, we were interested in examining the influence of these 5-HT antagonists in combination with the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine, which clearly impairs performance in such tasks (Welzl et al 1989;Sanger 1992;Stephens and Cole 1996;Higgins et al 2003). For the 5-CSRTT experiments, we also included the novel NR2B subunit-selective antagonist Ro 63-1908 (Gill et al 2002), which has a particularly striking effect on premature responding in this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioural disturbances induced by NMDA receptor blockade are particularly pronounced in tests that require a degree of inhibitory control. For example, in behavioural situations requiring animals to tolerate a delay before making a response, such as performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT; Robbins 2002) and operant responding maintained by a differential low rate of responding (DRL), dizocilpine pretreatment increases the probability of the animals making premature responses (Welzl et al 1991;Sanger 1992;Stephens and Cole 1996;. We have extended these observations to the recently described NR2B subtype selective NMDA antagonist Ro 63-1908 (Gill et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30][31][32] For example, in a differential reinforcement of a low-rate 15-s (DRL-15 s), MK-801 (0.1-0.2 mg/kg) produced markedly higher rates of lever pressing, especially during a period of interresponse times of 5 s or less, suggesting that NMDA receptor antagonists disrupt timing behavior, leading to a large proportion of premature responses. 30) Moreover, MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) increased the response rate of schedule-controlled behavior in rats. 33) It is likely that the stimulatory effects of MK-801 may be mediated through the activation of the central dopaminergic system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fraction of animals (about 40%) were very clearly stimulated by 10-40mg/kg eliprodil, but the inter-animal variability was so high that the overall increase in locomotion was not statistically significant. We have noticed before that mice can be classified either as "responders" or "non-responders" to the low affinity NMDA channel blocker, dextromethorphan , and it is interesting to note that wide variations also occurred in the response rates of individual animals given phencyclidine, in a differential reinforcement paradigm (Sanger, 1992). Why eliprodil is motorgenic in some individuals and not others is not clear, but it may be related to its complex profile of interaction with other transmitter systems, including 6 receptors as well as noradrenergic and tryptaminergic systems (Chenard et al, 1991;Hashimoto and London, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%