2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6519(05)78598-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nivel auditivo y uso intensivo de teléfonos móviles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hearing function assessment through pure-tone audiometry has revealed abnormal thresholds at higher frequencies among similar participants (above 8 to 16 kHz) [2]. Studies by Jadia et al [3], Hegde et al [8], Callejo et al [9], and others highlighted sensorineural hearing loss in mobile phone users compared to non-users. Our research discerned variations in bone conduction thresholds, air conduction thresholds, and air-bone gaps, revealing noteworthy distinctions between dominant and non-dominant ears, albeit without reaching statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hearing function assessment through pure-tone audiometry has revealed abnormal thresholds at higher frequencies among similar participants (above 8 to 16 kHz) [2]. Studies by Jadia et al [3], Hegde et al [8], Callejo et al [9], and others highlighted sensorineural hearing loss in mobile phone users compared to non-users. Our research discerned variations in bone conduction thresholds, air conduction thresholds, and air-bone gaps, revealing noteworthy distinctions between dominant and non-dominant ears, albeit without reaching statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an illustrative instance, in the context of OAE, eight participants manifested the absence of OAE in the non-dominant ear, resulting in a non-statistically significant p-value of 0.1729, as determined by the Chi-square test. Similarly, the examination of the relationship between the duration of mobile phone usage and the absence of OAE yielded a non-statistically significant p-value of 0.410656, determined through the Chi-square test [3,[8][9][10][11]. On similar lines, Ramya et al [10] also found that there was a significant increase in the hearing thresholds at all frequencies for air conduction and bone conduction in the right ear (test group) compared with the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ear, being in close relation with the mobile phone, is at high risk because of electromagnetic radio waves. 13 There is a hypothesis that the usage of mobile phones is known to cause acoustic neuroma. 14 15 Long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields produced by mobile phones has been shown to cause hearing loss at the cochlear level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As diferenças de intensidades entre as orelhas, neste estudo, variam de 4,3 a 9 dB, o que representa uma sensibilidade até praticamente três vezes maior para uma orelha em relação à outra (16,18) . Apesar dos limiares tonais poderem ser percebidos com diferenças mínimas de 0,5 dB (9) , diversos autores em seus estudos utilizaram diferenças entre limiares das orelhas de até 10 dB (3)(4) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Portanto, para expressar coeficientes de pressão em decibel, a fórmula poderá ser escrita da seguinte maneira: ou Para minimizar a interferência das assimetrias interaurais, estudos que envolvem a localização de fontes sonoras, de um modo geral, estabelecem um valor máximo de 10 dB entre os limiares auditivos das duas orelhas, a exemplo de trabalhos anteriores (17) . Entretanto, sabe-se que diferenças de 6 dB já representam uma sensibilidade duas vezes maior para uma orelha em relação à outra (16,18) e 10 dB, aproximadamente dez vezes, o que, teoricamente, poderá dificultar a localização por DII.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified