2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrous oxide emissions in silvopastoral systems: Key driving variables and seasonality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of N excreta lost as NH 3 in the present study was in the range of 2-21% observed in previous studies in the tropical region [10,12,30]. However, they were lower than the IPCC default emission factor of 21% from the national guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions [1,8]. Ammonia emissions are an indirect source of N 2 O; therefore, studies quantifying its emissions are important to refine GHG inventories and environmental assessments of bovine production in grazing systems.…”
Section: Ammonia Volatilizationsupporting
confidence: 41%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of N excreta lost as NH 3 in the present study was in the range of 2-21% observed in previous studies in the tropical region [10,12,30]. However, they were lower than the IPCC default emission factor of 21% from the national guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions [1,8]. Ammonia emissions are an indirect source of N 2 O; therefore, studies quantifying its emissions are important to refine GHG inventories and environmental assessments of bovine production in grazing systems.…”
Section: Ammonia Volatilizationsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…Cardoso et al [2] reported that, with increased grazing intensity, N 2 O emissions also increase due to the rise of N being returned to the soil through the excreta (mainly from urine). In addition, variables such as soil temperature and moisture drive the N 2 O production process [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hourly gases fluxes (mg of N 2 O or CH 4 or CO 2 per m −2 h −1 ) were calculated according to Cardoso et al 55 : where δC/δt is the change in gas concentration in the chamber during the deployment time; V and A are the chamber volume and soil area covered by the chamber, respectively; M is the molecular weight of the gas; and Vm is the molecular volume of gas. The Vm parameter was corrected to the standard conditions of temperature and pressure as Vm = 0.02241 × (273.15 + Tc/273.15) × p0/p1, where 0.02241 is the molar volume (m 3 ), Tc is the chamber headspace temperature at sampling time (°C), p0 is the air pressure at sea level, and p1 is the local pressure calculated using the barometric equation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correct choice of the forestry and forage component plays a fundamental role in ensuring the success of the SPS implementation. Thus, the forest species should allow the luminous incidence to reach the forage canopy, must have low invasive potential, and provide marketable products [2]. In Brazil, the genus Eucalyptus has been highlighted for use in SPS because it presents desirable characteristics, besides being one of the most studied species for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%