2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrous oxide emissions from winter oilseed rape cultivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
50
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
9
50
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A high share of post‐harvest N 2 O emissions to the total annual N 2 O loss was also reported from Ruser et al. () who measured trace gas fluxes at five study sites representative for German winter oilseed rape production. They explained the high post‐harvest emissions with increased nitrate contents combined with O 2 consumption during the turn‐over of the OSR residues thus favoring N 2 O release from denitrification.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A high share of post‐harvest N 2 O emissions to the total annual N 2 O loss was also reported from Ruser et al. () who measured trace gas fluxes at five study sites representative for German winter oilseed rape production. They explained the high post‐harvest emissions with increased nitrate contents combined with O 2 consumption during the turn‐over of the OSR residues thus favoring N 2 O release from denitrification.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…). Although our measurement period covered only 299 days, the order of magnitude of cumulative emissions was similar to annual emissions reported from OSR fields ( Ruser et al., ) as well as from other arable crops ( Jungkunst et al., ). Between 50–68% of total N 2 O emission were released during the post‐harvest period covering only two months, highlighting the importance of that period for N 2 O budgets in OSR production.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It follows that, if the rainfall event had occurred at the time of the highest soil NO3- concentrations, the N 2 O emission might have reached higher levels and potentially created a significant difference between treatments with and without DMPP. The haphazardness of precipitation (and the resulting increase in WFPS) in relation to NO3- availability following fertilization is known as a contributing factor to diverging cumulative N 2 O emissions between years (Ruser et al, ), but could also explain contrasting results between studies with respect to the apparent effects of DMPP in mitigating field‐scale N 2 O emissions. Future field studies addressing this topic should aim at experimentally stimulating N 2 O fluxes in periods of high NO3- soil concentrations by manipulation of soil water content, in order to quantify the latent emission risk under field conditions in addition to quantifying the emissions under the actual weather conditions prevailing during the study year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%