Abstract:Summary
The nitrogen (N) fertilizer required to supply a bioenergy industry with sufficient feedstocks is associated with adverse environmental impacts, including loss of oxidized reactive nitrogen through leaching and the production of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). We examined effects on crop yield, N fate and the response of ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia‐oxidizing archaea (AOA) to conventional fertilizer application or intercropping with N‐fixing alfalfa, for N delivery to switchgras… Show more
“…Reactive ammonium fertilizer not assimilated by crops or soil microbes can be a major source of N 2 O emissions as a byproduct of ammonia oxidation carried out by ammonia‐oxidizing archaea (AOA) and ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) among other abiotic and biotic processes (Sanford et al ., 2012). Due to the vast spatial heterogeneity and diversity of soil microbiota, the abundance and activity of the AOA and AOB varies, depending on site location, soil type, moisture content, soil pH, nutrient levels, as well as biotic factors such as species–species interactions and viral predation (Erguder et al ., 2009; Pannu et al ., 2019). This complexity makes it challenging to track the relative contributions of each microbial group to ammonia oxidation and N 2 O emissions in different environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a recent study of the same site as that used in our present study (Prosser, WA, USA) reported an increase in the relative abundance of AOA in intercrop plots (i.e. switchgrass and alfalfa) compared with monocrop fertilized plots, but this increase did not correlate to lower N 2 O emissions (Pannu et al ., 2019), making it challenging to interpret the observed increase in nitrogen and, more specifically, ammonia with relatively low N 2 O emissions from intercrop plots. At another site, intercropping wheat ( Triticum aestium L.) and soybean ( Glycin max L.) were reported to change the dominant species of AOB and increase the expression of nitrogen cycle related functional genes in the rhizosphere (Wallenstein et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At another site, intercropping wheat ( Triticum aestium L.) and soybean ( Glycin max L.) were reported to change the dominant species of AOB and increase the expression of nitrogen cycle related functional genes in the rhizosphere (Wallenstein et al ., 2006). Most previous studies were based on PCR‐generated gene amplicons (Meinhardt et al ., 2018; Pannu et al ., 2019). Thus, it remains unclear if novel diversity was missed due to primer specificity to only known sequences used for primer design (Meinhardt et al ., 2015).…”
Summary
The use of nitrogen fertilizer on bioenergy crops such as switchgrass results in increased costs, nitrogen leaching and emissions of N2O, a potent greenhouse gas. Intercropping with nitrogen‐fixing alfalfa has been proposed as an environmentally sustainable alternative, but the effects of synthetic fertilizer versus intercropping on soil microbial community functionality remain uncharacterized. We analysed 24 metagenomes from the upper soil layer of agricultural fields from Prosser, WA over two growing seasons and representing three agricultural practices: unfertilized switchgrass (control), fertilized switchgrass and switchgrass intercropped with alfalfa. The synthetic fertilization and intercropping did not result in major shifts of microbial community taxonomic and functional composition compared with the control plots, but a few significant changes were noted. Most notably, mycorrhizal fungi, ammonia‐oxidizing archaea and bacteria increased in abundance with intercropping and fertilization. However, only betaproteobacterial ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria abundance in fertilized plots significantly correlated to N2O emission and companion qPCR data. Collectively, a short period of intercropping elicits minor but significant changes in the soil microbial community toward nitrogen preservation and that intercropping may be a viable alternative to synthetic fertilization.
“…Reactive ammonium fertilizer not assimilated by crops or soil microbes can be a major source of N 2 O emissions as a byproduct of ammonia oxidation carried out by ammonia‐oxidizing archaea (AOA) and ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) among other abiotic and biotic processes (Sanford et al ., 2012). Due to the vast spatial heterogeneity and diversity of soil microbiota, the abundance and activity of the AOA and AOB varies, depending on site location, soil type, moisture content, soil pH, nutrient levels, as well as biotic factors such as species–species interactions and viral predation (Erguder et al ., 2009; Pannu et al ., 2019). This complexity makes it challenging to track the relative contributions of each microbial group to ammonia oxidation and N 2 O emissions in different environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a recent study of the same site as that used in our present study (Prosser, WA, USA) reported an increase in the relative abundance of AOA in intercrop plots (i.e. switchgrass and alfalfa) compared with monocrop fertilized plots, but this increase did not correlate to lower N 2 O emissions (Pannu et al ., 2019), making it challenging to interpret the observed increase in nitrogen and, more specifically, ammonia with relatively low N 2 O emissions from intercrop plots. At another site, intercropping wheat ( Triticum aestium L.) and soybean ( Glycin max L.) were reported to change the dominant species of AOB and increase the expression of nitrogen cycle related functional genes in the rhizosphere (Wallenstein et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At another site, intercropping wheat ( Triticum aestium L.) and soybean ( Glycin max L.) were reported to change the dominant species of AOB and increase the expression of nitrogen cycle related functional genes in the rhizosphere (Wallenstein et al ., 2006). Most previous studies were based on PCR‐generated gene amplicons (Meinhardt et al ., 2018; Pannu et al ., 2019). Thus, it remains unclear if novel diversity was missed due to primer specificity to only known sequences used for primer design (Meinhardt et al ., 2015).…”
Summary
The use of nitrogen fertilizer on bioenergy crops such as switchgrass results in increased costs, nitrogen leaching and emissions of N2O, a potent greenhouse gas. Intercropping with nitrogen‐fixing alfalfa has been proposed as an environmentally sustainable alternative, but the effects of synthetic fertilizer versus intercropping on soil microbial community functionality remain uncharacterized. We analysed 24 metagenomes from the upper soil layer of agricultural fields from Prosser, WA over two growing seasons and representing three agricultural practices: unfertilized switchgrass (control), fertilized switchgrass and switchgrass intercropped with alfalfa. The synthetic fertilization and intercropping did not result in major shifts of microbial community taxonomic and functional composition compared with the control plots, but a few significant changes were noted. Most notably, mycorrhizal fungi, ammonia‐oxidizing archaea and bacteria increased in abundance with intercropping and fertilization. However, only betaproteobacterial ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria abundance in fertilized plots significantly correlated to N2O emission and companion qPCR data. Collectively, a short period of intercropping elicits minor but significant changes in the soil microbial community toward nitrogen preservation and that intercropping may be a viable alternative to synthetic fertilization.
“…In general, these two sources of N 2 O emissions are dominated by microbial activity and largely emitted in pulse events under certain combinations of oxygen and moisture conditions. 89 Binary legume-grass mixtures have been consistently shown to have lower N 2 O emissions than grass-only systems fertilized with mineral N, 80,90,91 suggesting that legume addition to grass monocultures can be an effective means to reduce soil N 2 O emissions. For example, Pannu et al 91 found that intercropping alfalfa into switchgrass did not increase yield as much as did fertilization at 224 kg-N ha À1 year À1 (63% versus 112%); however, the former emitted far less N 2 O per ha of land and thus had 40% lower N 2 O emissions per Mg of biomass produced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89 Binary legume-grass mixtures have been consistently shown to have lower N 2 O emissions than grass-only systems fertilized with mineral N, 80,90,91 suggesting that legume addition to grass monocultures can be an effective means to reduce soil N 2 O emissions. For example, Pannu et al 91 found that intercropping alfalfa into switchgrass did not increase yield as much as did fertilization at 224 kg-N ha À1 year À1 (63% versus 112%); however, the former emitted far less N 2 O per ha of land and thus had 40% lower N 2 O emissions per Mg of biomass produced. Similarly, Johnson and Barbour 80 reported that interseeding legumes into switchgrass and big bluestem led to an average of $30% reduction (yield-scaled) in comparison to a fertilization rate of 112 kg-N ha À1 year À1 .…”
Bioenergy from perennial grasses mitigates climate change via displacing fossil fuels and storing atmospheric CO 2 belowground as soil carbon. Here, we conduct a critical review to examine whether increasing plant diversity in bioenergy grassland systems can further increase their climate change mitigation potential. We find that compared with highly productive monocultures, diverse mixtures tend to produce as great or greater yields. In particular, there is strong evidence that legume addition improves yield, in some cases equivalent to mineral nitrogen fertilization at 33-150 kg per ha. Plant diversity can also promote soil carbon storage in the long term, reduce soil N 2 O emissions by 30%-40%, and suppress weed invasion, hence reducing herbicide use. These potential benefits of plant diversity translate to 50%-65% greater life-cycle greenhouse gas savings for biofuels from more diverse grassland biomass grown on degraded soils. In addition, there is growing evidence that plant diversity can accelerate land restoration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.