2013
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrous oxide: are we still in equipoise? A qualitative review of current controversies

Abstract: This review considers the current position of nitrous oxide in anaesthetic practice and balances potential beneficial and disadvantageous effects. The classic adverse characteristics of nitrous oxide, such as diffusion hypoxia, expansion of gas-filled spaces, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, are often cited as reasons to avoid this old drug. Recent concerns regarding neurotoxicity, adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and wound complications have further hardened many practitioners against nitrous oxide. New… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These stakeholders include the trial designers, recruiters, patient and public representatives and participants, as well as health care staff who are not directly involved in the trial but will use the evidence produced by it. A lack of equipoise amongst stakeholders may lead to poor recruitment practices, low recruitment rates or a lack of utility of the evidence in the real world [29]. Consideration of the question of equipoise at the feasibility phase can offer opportunities to address this, for example through education, increasing awareness and enabling open discussion of the issues, or highlight the option of not progressing to an expensive full trial [30, 31].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stakeholders include the trial designers, recruiters, patient and public representatives and participants, as well as health care staff who are not directly involved in the trial but will use the evidence produced by it. A lack of equipoise amongst stakeholders may lead to poor recruitment practices, low recruitment rates or a lack of utility of the evidence in the real world [29]. Consideration of the question of equipoise at the feasibility phase can offer opportunities to address this, for example through education, increasing awareness and enabling open discussion of the issues, or highlight the option of not progressing to an expensive full trial [30, 31].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we used both 50% N 2 O and 0.7% sevoflurane for the purpose of reducing the latter dosage while preserving the amnestic effect during the final hour of the operation. N 2 O administration to prevent anesthetic awareness is controversial 7 ; however, N 2 O would be effective for maintenance of anesthesia during minimally invasive operations and is not associated with the risk of developing MS. 8 Concerning body temperature, the possibility of development of hyperthermia should be considered. 1,[4][5][6] Heat exposure blocks conduction in demyelinated axons and can trigger recurrence of MS, and body temperature should be closely monitored and controlled during the perioperative period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Anaesthetic opinion has been divided as to whether it should still be used. 6 It may not be an effective analgesic for women in labour -in one (small but widely quoted) trial of analgesia in early labour, compressed air was of similar efficacy. 7 The gas has adverse effects and undesirable properties; but it has advantages, 8 too, such as rapid onset of action, 9 and little overall effect on heart rate and blood pressure.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%