2012
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen use efficiency in grain production and the estimated nitrogen input/output balance in China agriculture

Abstract: The great challenge is to balance the use of current N fertilisers between regions and crops to improve N use efficiency while maintaining or increasing crop production under the high-intensity agricultural system of China.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an early study, comparing conventional tillage versus conservation tillage, Franzluebbers et al (1995) [26] estimated that, under adequate temperature and moisture conditions, NO 3− accumulated at a rate of ≈0.03 g N m −2 d −1 , which equals to 110 kg N ha −1 year −1 . If 30 kg N (PFPN = 30 kg grain kg −1 N) are required to produce 1000 kg of wheat grain [27], 80 kg N would support yields of around 2600 kg ha −1 , which is close to the mean yields recorded in the control plots in this study during the last three cycles (2870 kg ha −1 ). For the fertilized plots, because mineralization rates would be expected to be higher in fertilized than in the control plots [28], it is estimated that they received a rate of about 230 kg N ha −1 cycle −1 (150 from applied fertilizer + 80 from soil mineralization).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In an early study, comparing conventional tillage versus conservation tillage, Franzluebbers et al (1995) [26] estimated that, under adequate temperature and moisture conditions, NO 3− accumulated at a rate of ≈0.03 g N m −2 d −1 , which equals to 110 kg N ha −1 year −1 . If 30 kg N (PFPN = 30 kg grain kg −1 N) are required to produce 1000 kg of wheat grain [27], 80 kg N would support yields of around 2600 kg ha −1 , which is close to the mean yields recorded in the control plots in this study during the last three cycles (2870 kg ha −1 ). For the fertilized plots, because mineralization rates would be expected to be higher in fertilized than in the control plots [28], it is estimated that they received a rate of about 230 kg N ha −1 cycle −1 (150 from applied fertilizer + 80 from soil mineralization).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…No significant differences in the partial factor productivity of nitrogen (kg grain . kg -1 N applied) were found between the conventional and the CULTAN treatment, which according to Li et al (2013) means the same nitrogen use efficiency in both application types of nitrogen fertilizers. Significantly higher nitrogen remobilization efficiency (NRE) was recorded with the CULTAN treatment compared to the conventional treatment in the applications of 150 kg N.ha -1 and 200 kg N.ha -1 when the CULTAN fertilization was carried out at the beginning of tillering (BBCH 22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A lower accumulation of nitrogen in plant biomass results in higher nitrogen utilization efficiency (Pask et al 2012). Moreover, higher nitrogen rates decrease the efficiency of fertilization ) which can be maintained particularly by excellent management practices (Li et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, considering all observations from field trials, the average values of IE N , remained within the ranges for general crops summarized by Dobemann (2005), from 30 to 60 kg kg -1 for IE N , 40 to 70 kg kg -1 for PFP N , 10 to 30 kg kg -1 for AE N and 30% to 50 % for RE N , respectively. However, more N input generally occurred compared with other areas of the world, which resulted in relatively lower NUE in China (Ladha et al 2005;Li et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%