2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:wafo.0000028367.69158.8d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Turnover and Nitrate Leaching after Bark Beetle Attack in Mountainous Spruce Stands of the Bavarian Forest National Park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 for further details of the organic N in the surface humus was mineralized. Elevated NO 3 -concentrations after disturbances due to clear cutting or other harvesting methods (Vitousek et al 1979;Dahlgren and Driscoll 1994;Weis et al 2006;Fukuzawa et al 2006), windthrows (Mellert et al 1996), or insect attacks (Huber et al 2004c, Huber 2005 have been frequently observed. Nitrate concentrations generally increase within the first two or three years (Dahlgren and Driscoll 1994;Gundersen et al 2006;Weis et al 2006) owing to mineralisation and nitrification of litterfall initially and harvesting residues.…”
Section: Nitrate Leachingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 for further details of the organic N in the surface humus was mineralized. Elevated NO 3 -concentrations after disturbances due to clear cutting or other harvesting methods (Vitousek et al 1979;Dahlgren and Driscoll 1994;Weis et al 2006;Fukuzawa et al 2006), windthrows (Mellert et al 1996), or insect attacks (Huber et al 2004c, Huber 2005 have been frequently observed. Nitrate concentrations generally increase within the first two or three years (Dahlgren and Driscoll 1994;Gundersen et al 2006;Weis et al 2006) owing to mineralisation and nitrification of litterfall initially and harvesting residues.…”
Section: Nitrate Leachingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to N deposition, atmospheric deposition of DOC is low (Lindroos et al, 2008) and thus has not been identified as major driver of DOC leaching from subsoil (Fröberg et al, 2007;Kaiser and Kalbitz, 2012;Verstraeten et al, 2014). Moreover, studies show contrasting results but point to increased DOC (TOC) leaching from soil and catchments after forest disturbances (Huber et al, 2004;Löfgren et al, 2014;Meyer et al, 1983;Mikkelson et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2014).…”
Section: A Hartmann Et Al: Model-aided Quantification Of Dissolved mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mountainous catchments the latter flow paths are likely due to the steepness of the catchment slopes (Boyer et al, 1997;Sakamoto et al, 1999;Terajima and Moriizumi, 2013). The missing signal of forest disturbance on DOC concentrations at weir 1 even shortly after the disturbance may be due to the minor extension of the disturbed area, the minor increase of surface and shallow subsurface flow due to the relative low slope of the disturbed area, the buffering of increased topsoil DOC leaching due to absorption of DOC within the subsoil (Borken et al, 2011;Huber et al, 2004), missing DOC-rich riparian source areas (i.e. wetlands, floodplains) and the reduction in pre-disturbance organic matter input to soil (i.e.…”
Section: Impact Of Stormsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang et al (1999b) reported that the mean annual accumulation of total N (aboveground) was approximately 124.0 kg N ha -1 and the annual return of total N via litterfall was about 40.0 kg N ha -1 for the poplar plantations with planting density of 1,111 stems ha -1 over a 6-year rotation. Natural annual N loss is about 10-250 kg N ha -1 as a result of combined losses associated with precipitation input and ecosystem N dynamics (Huber et al 2004). Therefore, mulching weight and mulching intervals for each mulching species would be different at various ages of poplar plantations as well as at different sites.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%