2001
DOI: 10.1081/css-120000971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen transformations and emission of greenhouse gases from three acid soils of humid tropics amended with n sources and moisture regime. II. Nitrous oxide and methane fluxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with findings for temperate forest soils, where the organic layer and SOC rich uppermost mineral layers which immediately show methanogenic activity and net emission of CH 4 if oxygen becomes limited (Saari et al 1997;Butterbach-Bahl and Papen 2002). This indicates that methanogenic activity is ubiquitous in upland soils, especially in C rich microhabitats, supporting active mineralization associated with O 2 consumption and in turn anaerobiosis at the microscale (Khalil et al 2001;Khalil and Baggs 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is in accordance with findings for temperate forest soils, where the organic layer and SOC rich uppermost mineral layers which immediately show methanogenic activity and net emission of CH 4 if oxygen becomes limited (Saari et al 1997;Butterbach-Bahl and Papen 2002). This indicates that methanogenic activity is ubiquitous in upland soils, especially in C rich microhabitats, supporting active mineralization associated with O 2 consumption and in turn anaerobiosis at the microscale (Khalil et al 2001;Khalil and Baggs 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…With this, we verified that nitrification did not significantly affect the rhizospheric acidity, supposedly due to the low rates achieved. Other studies also report a low nitrification rate in soil (Khalil, Boeckx, Rosenani, & Cleemput, 2001;Zhao, Cai, & Xu, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Consequently, soil organic carbon input increased (Loya et al 2004), resulting in increased available substrate during the green and tillering periods, which further led to higher mean CO 2 flux and higher cumulative CO 2 emission than those from the SR-S treatment. However, the anaerobic conditions (Spormann & Widdel 2000) present after irrigation and the high carbon/nitrogen ratio (Khalil et al 2001) retarded straw decomposition for the entire growing period during spring in the SR-S treatment. Abundant substrate was thereby made available for a longer period, leading to a CO 2 flux peak several days later (first peak), and in the SR-S treatment this led to greater CO 2 mean flux compared to the SR-A treatment in combination with higher cumulative CO 2 emissions during the booting to grain-filling periods.…”
Section: Discussion Co 2 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 95%