2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-019-10045-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen sources and application rates affect emissions of N2O and NH3 in sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of NH 3 volatilization depends on the amount of the urea applied to the soil. The NH 3 volatilization loss increased with the increasing rate urea applications, which is in agreement with previous works [20,35,36]. The LU in soil that was previously hydrolysed could proceed through nitrification due to favourable moisture content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of NH 3 volatilization depends on the amount of the urea applied to the soil. The NH 3 volatilization loss increased with the increasing rate urea applications, which is in agreement with previous works [20,35,36]. The LU in soil that was previously hydrolysed could proceed through nitrification due to favourable moisture content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Researchers have recommended several mechanisms to enhance the NUE of applied urea to confirm the need-based smooth supply of N while lowering the risk of N losses. Soil and fertilizer management have been reported to reduce significant losses of N from NH 3 volatilization and N 2 O emission [18][19][20]. However, there is currently no single technology available that can increase NUE by restricting the NH 3 volatilization and N 2 O emission from applied urea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest, we expected that application of N would promote the increase of mineralization and content of N in soil. However, in our study we did not notice this result with a small difference of 0.2 g kg -1 between residue and residue + N. Possibly this result can be associated with the low rate of residues tested, which was 50% lower than in the field (green harvest), and application of N as a source of urea; which is characterized by high losses of N through ammonia volatilization, mainly when surface-applied to soils [50][51][52][53] . 54 showed that N lost by application of N as urea can achieve 35% of N applied when associated with sugarcane residue.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…This is because, after soil application, urea is hydrolyzed by urease to form ammonium carbonate [CO(NH2)2 + 2H2O → (NH4)2CO3], which decomposes rapidly to ammonium, hydroxyl, and bicarbonate [(NH4)2CO3 + H2O → 2NH4 + + OH -+ HCO3 -], increasing pH around fertilizer granules (Rochette et al, 2009). In short, if urea is not incorporated into the soil, as in this study, part of the NH4 + can convert to NH3 and be lost to the atmosphere (Nascimento et al, 2013;Rochette et al, 2013;Degaspari et al, 2020;Soares et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Ammonia volatilization from urea on the soil surface can be low, totaling 1%, or extremely high, above 50% of the applied N (Cantarella et al, 2008;Sanz-Cobena et al, 2012;Tasca et al, 2011;Rochette et al, 2013). When high N doses are applied, losses can be greater (Ma et al, 2010) when soil moisture for infiltration is low and temperatures are high, as well as a greater amount of vegetation cover on the soil surface (Tasca et al, 2011;Nascimento et al, 2013;Liu et al 2019;Degaspari et al, 2020;Soares et al, 2020), as observed in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%