2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02101.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen resorption and photosynthetic activity over leaf life span in an evergreen shrub, Rhododendron ferrugineum, in a subalpine environment

Abstract: Summary• Here, the advantages for a shrub of having long vs short-lived leaves was investigated in Rhododendron ferrugineum by following nitrogen( 15 N) and carbon( 14 C) resorption and translocation, and photosynthetic capacity over the life span.• Mean leaf life span was 19 months. Nitrogen (N) resorption in attached leaves occurred mainly in the first year (23%) and reached a maximum of 31% in the second. Although, resorption was similar in attached and fallen 1-yr-old leaves, it was on average one-third hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method provides reasonable estimates for the time of green-up; the green-up dates determined with this method are only 10-20 days after snowmelt. This estimate more or less agrees with the time of major leaf expansion (Marell et al 2006;Pornon and Lamaze 2007). White et al (2009) compared 10 methods for detecting green-up from RS and also found that method a (Midpoint pixel of White et al (2009)) was one of the only two that was well correlated to start of spring (SOS) measures and with a low bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The method provides reasonable estimates for the time of green-up; the green-up dates determined with this method are only 10-20 days after snowmelt. This estimate more or less agrees with the time of major leaf expansion (Marell et al 2006;Pornon and Lamaze 2007). White et al (2009) compared 10 methods for detecting green-up from RS and also found that method a (Midpoint pixel of White et al (2009)) was one of the only two that was well correlated to start of spring (SOS) measures and with a low bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Our results suggest that LLS is strongly influenced by the discrepancy between shoot nitrogen demand and soil nitrogen uptake, rather than nitrogen demand alone, as suggested by Hikosaka (2005). The reduction in LLS allows the plants to produce new leaves with high photosynthetic capacity (Pornon & Lamaze, 2007), revealing a plastic response that maximizes biomass production rather than nutrient conservation, even in nitrogen‐poor habitats. Altogether, our findings underline the major influence of sink organ development on the control of both LLS and NR, and the key role of woody tissues, firstly by supplying new shoots during the growing period and secondly by accumulating nitrogen from old foliage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SpeciWc leaf area is usually positively correlated with light use eYciency; thinner leaves require less photosynthetic machinery per unit area (Burns 2004), while thicker or denser leaves have greater internal shading and diVusion limitations, which may restrict the potential for higher photosynthetic capacity because of the chloroplast stacking in thick leaves (Reich et al 1998). In turn, low SLA foliage tends to be longer lived but less productive than thinner leaves (Pornon and Lamaze 2007), indicating a trade-oV between photosynthetic capacity and leaf persistence (Hikosaka 2004;Shipley et al 2006). Cost-beneWt models (Kikuzawa and Ackerley 1999;Wright et al 2004;Ellison 2006) suggest that better nutrient availability and shorter leaf life spans allow the plant to reinvest nutrients in young, photosynthetically active tissues, leading to higher PNUE.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Capacity and Foliar Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 97%