2003
DOI: 10.1263/jbb.95.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Removal Characteristics and Biofilm Analysis of a Membrane-Aerated Biofilm Reactor Applicable to High-Strength Nitrogenous Wastewater Treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, most wastewater treatment bioreactors are operated such that the in situ concentrations of COD and ammonia are low. Numerous previous studies, however, have demonstrated that AOB and denitrifying bacteria can grow under these conditions [11,18,23]. Our study is also limited by the destructive nature of biofilm removal and slicing, which limited our ability to perform replicate analyses of our biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, most wastewater treatment bioreactors are operated such that the in situ concentrations of COD and ammonia are low. Numerous previous studies, however, have demonstrated that AOB and denitrifying bacteria can grow under these conditions [11,18,23]. Our study is also limited by the destructive nature of biofilm removal and slicing, which limited our ability to perform replicate analyses of our biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Simultaneously, the region of the biofilm furthest from the membrane should favor denitrification (i.e., rich in biodegradable organic compounds plus the nitrate produced via nitrification, but poor in oxygen). Indeed, numerous studies have reported the concomitant removal of both carbonaceous and nitrogenous pollutants in a single-stage MABR [11,12,19,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reported case is a treatment plant for sludge rejection water with influent NH 4 -N of 1,200 mg /L on average in a suspended biomass process (Mulder et al 2001). A higher influent NH 4 -N concentration case has been reported by Terada et al (2003), who studied a pilot-scale membrane-aerated biofilm process with an NH 4 -N concentration of 3,000 mg/L from swine wastewater. It seems that biological nitrification-denitrification treatment is applied and economical on a technical scale with wastewaters of NH 4 -N concentration much below 2,000 mg/L and abundant C/N ratio, e.g., above 7.0 (Carrera et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since no bubbles are formed, high oxygen utilization efficiency is achievable [6,7]. Moreover, gas stripping of volatile substances can be prevented, whereas in conventional reactor the reactants and products might be lost along with the escaping foam [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brindle et al [6] used MABR to treat synthetic inorganic wastewater and obtained above 98% ammonium-N (NH þ 4 -N) removal. Terada et al [7] utilized a surface-modified polyethylene membrane and total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrogen removal reached 96 and 83% at removal rates of 5.76 g-C/m 2 per day and 4.48 g-N/ m 2 per day, respectively. Biomass' control was needed for stable operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%