Nitrogen Leaching in Sand-based Rootzones Amended with Inorganic Soil Amendments and Sphagnum Peat

Abstract

<jats:p>sand-based rootzones are specified for golf course putting greens because they resist compaction and maintain drainage, even under heavy traffic. Although sands provide favorable physical properties, nutrient retention is generally poor and soluble nutrients like nitrogen (N) are prone to leaching. Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate several inorganic soil amendments (clinoptilolite zeolite (CZ), diatomaceous earth, and two porous ceramics), which varied in cation exchange capacity (CEC), and sphagnum peat for their ability to limit N leaching. Columns (35 cm tall × 7.6 cm diameter) were filled with 30 cm of sand-amendment mixtures (8:2 v/v) and NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub>NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> was applied in solution at a N rate of 50 kg·ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>. Leaching was initiated immediately using 2.5 pore volumes of distilled water in a continuous pulse. Leachate was collected in 0.1 pore volume aliquots and analyzed for NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub><jats:sup>+</jats:sup>-N and NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub><jats:sup>-</jats:sup>-N. All amendments significantly decreased NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub><jats:sup>+</jats:sup> leaching from 27% to 88% which was directly proportional to the CEC of the amendments. By contrast, NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub><jats:sup>-</jats:sup> losses were consistently high, and no amendment effectively decreased loss compared to nonamended sand. Two amendments with the highest CECs, CZ and a porous ceramic, were selected to further study the effects of amendment incorporation rate, depth, and incubation time on N leaching. Ammonium but not NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub><jats:sup>-</jats:sup> leaching was decreased with increasing amendment rate of both products. At 10% amendment (v/v) addition, only 17% to 33% of applied NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub><jats:sup>+</jats:sup> leached from the amended sands. Depth of amendment incorporation significantly affected NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub><jats:sup>+</jats:sup> leaching, with uniform distribution through the entire 30 cm tall column being more effective than placement within the upper 2.5 or 15 cm. Allowing the NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub>NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> to incubate for 12 or 24 hours following application generally did not affect the amount leached. These results suggest NH<jats:sub>4</jats:sub><jats:sup>+</jats:sup>-N leaching is inversely related to CEC of the root-zone mixture and that uniform distribution of these CEC enhancing amendments in the root-zone mixtures reduced N leaching to a greater extent than nonuniform distribution.</jats:p>

Role of soil-derived dissolved substances in arsenic transport and transformation in laboratory experiments

“…DOM competing with the soil matrix for As binding can also facilitate As transport in aqueous systems (Bauer and Blodau, 2006). The effect of NOM on the fate and transport of As on farmland and golf courses is particularly important because soils in these settings are commonly amended with organic matter (Bigelow, 2000), with peat moss as the most common amendment utilized at golf courses. The high organic content of peat moss can affect the transport of As species, including MMA in soils.…”

Nitrate, Ammonium, and Urea Leaching in Hybrid Bermudagrass as Affected by Nitrogen Source

“…Soil texture is another factor often included in turfgrass leaching research. In putting green research, the root zone mix itself was often a treatment variable (Brown et al, 1977, 1982; Mitchell et al, 1978; Sheard et al, 1985; Johnston et al, 2001; Bigelow et al, 2001). In most cases NO 3 –N leaching was greatest in soil or root zone mix that contained a higher percentage of sand.…”

Physical and Mineral‐Nutrition Properties of Sand‐Based Turfgrass Root Zones Amended with Biochar

“…Low cation exchange capacity (CEC) and rapid drainage promote nutrient leaching through sand‐based root zones (Sartain and Brown, 1998; Bigelow et al, 2001; Petri and Petrovic, 2001). However, leaching rates of applied N are reduced by charcoal additions to soil (Lehmann et al, 2003).…”