2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen isotope systematics and origins of mixed-habit diamonds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from our ab initio calculations provide strong support for 12 C isotope affinity to cubic growth diamond relative to octahedral crystal faces. The difference of 3.75 is expected within the first crystal layer at 1400 K (Figure 2).…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculations Of Carbon Isotope Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from our ab initio calculations provide strong support for 12 C isotope affinity to cubic growth diamond relative to octahedral crystal faces. The difference of 3.75 is expected within the first crystal layer at 1400 K (Figure 2).…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculations Of Carbon Isotope Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In the first layer, the instantaneous difference in δ 13 C between cube and octahedra is expected to be 3.75‰ at 1400 K, and this decreases to 1.85‰ at 2000 K. This difference disappears completely once one models seven or more layers below the crystal surface. Octahedron and rhombododecahedron surfaces display complicated relationships with a changeover in the affinity of 12 C isotope arising at the fifth layer inside the crystal lattice ( Figure 2). However, a clear qualitative difference of certain isotope affinity between faces of cubes and of octahedra can be traced at least down to the fifth layer.…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculations Of Carbon Isotope Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howell et al (2015) also noted minor fractionation between octahedral and cuboid growth sectors, but in the three "star" diamonds that they studied, they found no difference in the carbon isotopes and an average difference of 0.4-1‰ in δ 15 N (with maximum differences between contemporaneous spots reaching 2‰). However, in this case the octahedral sector is richer in 15 N. Howell et al (2015) also observed large differences in [N] between the two sectors. In the samples they studied, both sectors are rich in nitrogen but the octahedral sector (average ~2700 ppm) carries higher concentrations than the cuboid sector (~2000 ppm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In both sectors, the isotope ratios increase during the growth of the diamond, but spots sampling contemporaneous growth in the two sectors are separated by about 1.2‰. Howell et al (2015) also noted minor fractionation between octahedral and cuboid growth sectors, but in the three "star" diamonds that they studied, they found no difference in the carbon isotopes and an average difference of 0.4-1‰ in δ 15 N (with maximum differences between contemporaneous spots reaching 2‰). However, in this case the octahedral sector is richer in 15 N. Howell et al (2015) also observed large differences in [N] between the two sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The most common method applied to constrain nitrogen uptake into diamond is reverse modeling of empirical data. This method assigns a fluid-diamond partition coefficient for nitrogen by fitting the co-variations of carbon-isotope values and nitrogen abundances to a curve for a given temperature (using theoretical equilibrium carbon-isotope fractionation factors that assume the speciation of carbon as methane or carbonate: Javoy et al, 1984;Boyd et al, 1987Boyd et al, , 1992Boyd and Pillinger, 1994;Bulanova et al, 2002Bulanova et al, , 2014Cartigny et al, 1997Cartigny et al, , 1998aCartigny et al, ,b, 2001Cartigny et al, , 2003Cartigny et al, , 2004Cartigny et al, , 2009Klein-BenDavid et al, 2010;Harte et al, 1999;Hauri et al, 2002;Howell et al, 2013Howell et al, , 2015aGautheron et al, 2005;Hutchison et al, 1997;Mikhail et al, 2013Mikhail et al, , 2014aStachel and Harris, 2009;Palot et al, 2009Palot et al, , 2012Palot et al, , 2014Thomassot et al, 2007Thomassot et al, , 2009, where T is independently determined using the degree of nitrogen aggregation and/or geothermometry on paired silicate inclusions (discussed by Stachel and Harris, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%