2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen fertilizer sources and tillage effects on cotton growth, yield, and fiber quality in a coastal plain soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This two-year field study has enabled us to evaluate the effect of EENFs on yield and quality of cotton grown under drip-fertigated system. Similar to other studies where the agronomic effectiveness of EENF products were minimal or absence 15,16 , polymer coated urea as ESN and addition of nitrification and urease inhibitors did not increase yield and fiber quality, and NRE of cotton in the current study. The absence of fertilizer source effect is highly associated with the unique conditions of drip-fertigation in the arid ecosystem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This two-year field study has enabled us to evaluate the effect of EENFs on yield and quality of cotton grown under drip-fertigated system. Similar to other studies where the agronomic effectiveness of EENF products were minimal or absence 15,16 , polymer coated urea as ESN and addition of nitrification and urease inhibitors did not increase yield and fiber quality, and NRE of cotton in the current study. The absence of fertilizer source effect is highly associated with the unique conditions of drip-fertigation in the arid ecosystem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…ESN was banded in the plant row before seeding. In treatments with urea, 20% of total N was banded in the plant row before seeding, and the remaining 80% was applied by six fertigation events at 9,11,14,15,16, and 17 weeks after planting. For treatment U + DI, NBPT and DCD were applied at rate of 1% urea N, with NBPT using the same strategy as urea while DCD being all banded in the plant row before seeding.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Agronomic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of Steiner et al 57 showed that compared with the treatment without biochar, the dry matter weight of crops treated with biochar decreased by 31.2% and the yield by 56.3% after applying N fertilizer. From the above results, the key to whether biochar can promote crop growth and increase yield is the combination and proportion of fertilizer and biochar and, such as C/N ratio 58,59 . Therefore, when applying biochar, soil fertility should be fully considered, and an appropriate C/N ratio should be used 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 As características do NA mostram-se vantajosas diante das demais fontes de nitrogênio que poderiam substituí-lo nas formulações de fertilizantes, tais como: a amônia anidra (NH 3 ) -volátil, básica, de difícil manuseio e alto custo; a ureia (CH 4 N 2 O)volátil e propensa à perda de N; o sulfato de amônio ((NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) -baixa disponibilidade de N para a planta (21%) e elevada acidez; e o nitrogênio líquido (composto pela mistura de NA e ureia)difícil manuseio e requer condições custosas para armazenamento. 14 Entretanto, de acordo com Watts, Runion e Balkcom (2017), 15 o domínio do NA como fertilizante nitrogenado para agricultura tem diminuído ao longo dos anos devido à preocupação em torno da utilização deste agente químico em ataques terroristas. A combinação explosiva de NA e óleo combustível, por exemplo, pode ser utilizada para a fabricação de Improvised Explosive Devices (IED), em tradução livre, bombas caseiras.…”
Section: Aplicações E Considerações Econômicas Do Nitrato De Amôniounclassified