2021
DOI: 10.17957/ijab/15.1720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates can be Lowered without Compromising Cotton Yield under Drip Irrigation System

Abstract: The effects of reducing N fertilizer use on soil NO3--N content and cotton yield were studied through a three-year (2015 to 2017) field experiment in South Xinjiang of China. Cotton was sown under drip irrigation system using five N fertilizer reduction treatments as: conventional N application rate (N100), N application rate reduced by 16.67% (N-16.67), 33.33% (N-33.33), 50% (N-50), and 100% (N-100). The data were recorded for changes in soil NO3--N content, and the SPAD value of cotton leaves was recorded at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrogen fertilizer was not applied for the first watering and the last watering of the crop. Besides, techniques such as topping, pest control, use of chemical regulators etc.were consistent with those that are adopted in previous studies [15,17].…”
Section: Experimental Designsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nitrogen fertilizer was not applied for the first watering and the last watering of the crop. Besides, techniques such as topping, pest control, use of chemical regulators etc.were consistent with those that are adopted in previous studies [15,17].…”
Section: Experimental Designsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Before sowing the seeds, the mixture of base fertilizers was sprinkled into the soil. Furthermore, the nitrogen fertilizer was utilized as base fertilizer, with 40% incorporated during the initial application, and the remaining 60% employed as top dressing [15]. The three test fields of area 4.8 × 6.9 m each were randomly selected.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations