1999
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1999.634912x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in a Dryland Cropping System

Abstract: No‐till (NT) increases the potential to crop more frequently in the Great Plains than with the conventional‐till (CT) crop–fallow farming system. More frequent cropping requires N input to maintain economical yields. We evaluated the effects of N fertilization on crop residue production and its subsequent effects on soil organic C (SOC) and total soil N (TSN) in a dryland NT annual cropping system. Six N rates (0, 22, 45, 67, 90, and 134 kg N ha−1) were applied to the same plots from 1984 through 1994, except … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
109
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our values of C sequestration rates for dryland cropping systems were within the range reported by Halvorson et al [26]. Nitrogen fertilization has been known to increase soil C sequestration compared with no N fertilization [27]. Increased C mineralization due to soil disturbance as a result of tillage, followed by reduced or absence of crop residue returned to the soil due to no N fertilization or fallow were probably the reasons for negative C sequestration rates in CTB/N1, CTB/N0, NTB/N0, and CTB-F/N0 [11] [27].…”
Section: Soil Carbon Sequestrationsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our values of C sequestration rates for dryland cropping systems were within the range reported by Halvorson et al [26]. Nitrogen fertilization has been known to increase soil C sequestration compared with no N fertilization [27]. Increased C mineralization due to soil disturbance as a result of tillage, followed by reduced or absence of crop residue returned to the soil due to no N fertilization or fallow were probably the reasons for negative C sequestration rates in CTB/N1, CTB/N0, NTB/N0, and CTB-F/N0 [11] [27].…”
Section: Soil Carbon Sequestrationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nitrogen fertilization has been known to increase soil C sequestration compared with no N fertilization [27]. Increased C mineralization due to soil disturbance as a result of tillage, followed by reduced or absence of crop residue returned to the soil due to no N fertilization or fallow were probably the reasons for negative C sequestration rates in CTB/N1, CTB/N0, NTB/N0, and CTB-F/N0 [11] [27]. Increased C mineralization due to higher precipitation and coarser soil texture also were the possible reasons for lower C sequestration rates in Nesson Valley than Sidney, since increased CO 2 emissions in the former than the latter site have been known [17] [20].…”
Section: Soil Carbon Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humus is especially rich in N, which comprises 4%-6% of soil organic matter mass. Hence, C sequestration in soil humus requires input of both N and C that exceeds the output of these elements from an ecosystem.Thus, in many cropping systems, the application of N fertilizer increases soil C sequestration through augmented plant productivity and increased return of crop residues (114,115).…”
Section: Soil Quality Nitrogen Requirements and Greenhouse Gas Emismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) and carbonate carbon (IC) in agricultural land can be influenced by management practices such as tillage, fertilizer N inputs and crop rotations (Halvorson et al, 2002;Russell et al, 2005). Optimizing fertilizer N inputs, for instance, may increase SOC content by increasing crop yields and hence the amount of residues returned to soils (Janzen et al, 1998;Halvorson et al, 1999;Huang and Sun, 2005). Excessive fertilizer N may block SOC sequestration through suppression of the microbial population or stimulation of mineralization of old native organic C (McCarty and Meisinger, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%