wileyonlinelibrary.comsulfur into the electrolyte, followed by its subsequent diffusion to the anode or more commonly known as the polysulfide (PS) shuttle effect. This causes unwanted side reactions ultimately resulting in poor cycle durability, low energy density, and low coulombic efficiency. [6b,7] A common strategy to mitigate the PS shuttle effect is to confine the PS within the cathode with host materials such as graphene foams, [8] various types of porous carbon, [6b,9] in addition to doped-carbon materials exhibiting PS adsorptive capabilities. [10] While LIS's stability and energy density is crucial, a high rate performance should be considered to be equally important and put under more scrutiny in the scientific community. In the case of electric vehicles (EV), the rate capability of the battery can influence the recharge time, acceleration, and regenerative braking efficiency. All of these parameters directly affect the final user experience of the vehicle and can cause serious damage to the reputation of EVs if poorly implemented. Often researchers have achieved LIS with impressive cycle durability, coulombic efficiency, and capacity, but do not fare well when subjected to higher rate performance tests. Indeed, a complex pore network will limit PS diffusion and provide enhanced durability, but the very same tortuous diffusion pathway out of the cathode will inevitably increase lithium ion diffusion resistance. When combined with the known electrolyte viscosity/resistance increase upon PS dissolution, [11] it is understandable as to why the rate performance is poor. Recent research into the rate performance of LIS revolves around providing efficient lithium ion and electron mass transfer pathways [12] or additional battery components such as an interlayer to provide additional surface area for faster PS reduction kinetics. [13] Interestingly, hollow structures, which have been previously used to successfully address the stability problems of LIS, commonly demonstrate excellent rate performances. [9,14] The distinct difference between hollow porous structures and regular porous carbon lies in the separation of the core electrolyte from the bulk electrolyte phases. The shell can act as a physical barrier to encapsulate PS, limiting dissolution of active sulfur material into the bulk electrolyte. More importantly, the hollow structures can serve as a electrolyte reservoir [15] to redirect PS diffusion inwards and reduce the PS concentration in the bulk electrolyte. This mitigates the effects of the PS dissolution induced viscosity increase. Accordingly, A CO 2 in water nanoparticle stabilized Pickering emulsion is used to template micrometer sized hollow porous nitrogen doped carbon particles for high rate performance lithium sulfur battery. For the first time, nanoparticles serve the dual role of an emulsion stabilizer and a pore template for the shell, directly utilizing in situ generated CO 2 bubbles as template for the core. The minimalistic nature of this method does not require expensive surfac...