2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen balances of innovative cropping systems for feedstock production to future biorefineries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotation with perennial grasses was found to double the biomass yield and biomass N Table 5. P-values, SEM and number of times behaviours occurred per session (8 min) in the different treatments and pig body weights (BW) prior to feeding N = 16, after feeding N = 64 and apart from feeding N = 32. and reduce nitrate leaching by 70-80% compared to the traditional systems with annual crops (Pugesgaard et al, 2015;Manevski et al, 2017Manevski et al, , 2018. Long term monitoring on the agricultural plains in southern Sweden have also shown lower soil carbon contents, compared to arable soils in forest districts with large areas of ley production (Eriksson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotation with perennial grasses was found to double the biomass yield and biomass N Table 5. P-values, SEM and number of times behaviours occurred per session (8 min) in the different treatments and pig body weights (BW) prior to feeding N = 16, after feeding N = 64 and apart from feeding N = 32. and reduce nitrate leaching by 70-80% compared to the traditional systems with annual crops (Pugesgaard et al, 2015;Manevski et al, 2017Manevski et al, , 2018. Long term monitoring on the agricultural plains in southern Sweden have also shown lower soil carbon contents, compared to arable soils in forest districts with large areas of ley production (Eriksson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental benefits in converting fields to perennial crops include reduced leaching of nitrogen, the potential to lower use of N-fertilizer and pesticides, and increased carbon storage in soils [29]. In two test sites in Denmark, Manevski et al [30] demonstrated that fertilized perennial grasses show the reduction of nitrate leached by 70-80% and double biomass N in comparison to the conventional farming methods such as continuous maize or triticale or cereal crop rotation. These results are is achieved because perennial grasses have more extensive root systems than annual crops, thus ensuring also lower soil erosion, higher carbon sequestration, reduced groundwater pollution, and higher biodiversity [31].…”
Section: Definition Of the Key Modelling Problem And Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Options for achieving beneficial LUC through perennialization can provide opportunities to reduce land use impacts while achieving high biomass yields. The biomass can then be refined to multiple products, including biofuels and animal feed, hence substituting conventional (cultivated) feed and reducing grazing requirements (Egeskog et al, 2011;Larsen et al, 2017;Manevski et al, 2017Manevski et al, , 2018Solati et al, 2018;Sparovek et al, 2007). Such options can help maintain or increase agricultural production in a region while limiting environmental impacts, or reduce imports of agricultural commodities that are associated with negative impacts where they are produced.…”
Section: Policy Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%