Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen balances for New York State: Implications for manure and fertilizer management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend may be explained by the relatively low animal densities of some NY dairies (Table 1) and by the relatively low fertilizer inputs in NY dairies compared with some of their counterparts in Europe or Australia. This trend is also consistent with the low (or negative) statewide crop N balances reported for NY (Swink et al, 2011).…”
Section: Initial Nmb Per Hectare and Per Megagram Of Milk Producedsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This trend may be explained by the relatively low animal densities of some NY dairies (Table 1) and by the relatively low fertilizer inputs in NY dairies compared with some of their counterparts in Europe or Australia. This trend is also consistent with the low (or negative) statewide crop N balances reported for NY (Swink et al, 2011).…”
Section: Initial Nmb Per Hectare and Per Megagram Of Milk Producedsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This intake percentage might be expected to be higher than that of the IN dairy since the manure loading the basins are from the milking parlor, holding area, and the barns. This percentage of feed N excreted and emitted by the basins at the WI dairy was within the range of compiled values [40] but much lower than that of dairies in the mid-Atlantic region of the US [41,42]. Partial separation of the liquid and solid manure loading the basins may explain a portion of the differences between dairies.…”
Section: Seasonal and Annual Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The low percentage of feed N intake in the IN lagoon emissions was partly due to the lagoon holding only liquid waste, which is typically 40% to 50% of excreted N [4,36]. Even assuming only 50% of the excreted N loaded the lagoon, the estimated total manure emissions relative to intake N would be about 20%, still lower than a compilation of studies (35% to 44%) reported by Liu et al [40] and much lower than the 72% to 76% reported for dairies in the mid-Atlantic region of the US [41,42]. The reason there was a relatively low percentage of N intake in the lagoon emissions is unknown.…”
Section: Seasonal and Annual Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among those surveyed, the average dairy farm had 295 cows with 625 acres of cropland averaging an animal density of 0.33 animal units (AU) per acre, a little below the 0.41 AU/acre average for New York in 2007 (13). The average crop farm was 1030 acres.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both dairy and crop farmers indicated that the potential for manure export/import is limited due to a lack of sufficient amounts of manure. This "lack of manure" concern is valid for New York; the statewide N balance for 2007 was -34 lbs/acre when manure N losses in the barn and storage and land application losses were taken into account (13). However, manure N management (timing and application method) choices can have a large impact on how much manure must be applied per acre to meet crop N needs.…”
Section: Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%