2009
DOI: 10.1039/b901207a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and phosphorus retention in surface waters: an inter-comparison of predictions by catchment models of different complexity

Abstract: Nitrogen and phosphorus retention estimates in streams and standing water bodies were compared for four European catchments by a series of catchment-scale modelling tools of different complexity, ranging from a simple, equilibrium input-output type to dynamic, physical-based models: source apportionment, MONERIS, EveNFlow, TRK, SWAT, and NL-CAT. The four catchments represent diverse climate, hydrology, and nutrient loads from diffuse and point sources in Norway, the UK, Italy, and the Czech Republic. The model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are expressed as tonnes of P or N per year for total load, retention, total emissions, and emissions through each of the pathways. Full details on MONERIS can be found in Venohr et al (2009).…”
Section: The Moneris Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Results are expressed as tonnes of P or N per year for total load, retention, total emissions, and emissions through each of the pathways. Full details on MONERIS can be found in Venohr et al (2009).…”
Section: The Moneris Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our version differs from MONERIS only slightly in how in-stream nutrient retention is estimated, as discussed in the calibration section below. All other equations are as described in Venohr et al (2009). In the remainder of the paper when we refer to the model MONERIS, the calculations discussed have been made with the R version.…”
Section: The Moneris Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations