2001
DOI: 10.3354/meps219025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and phosphorus retention estimated independently by flux measurements and dynamic modelling in the estuary, Randers Fjord, Denmark

Abstract: Nutrient retention was studied in the Danish estuary Randers Fjord, using 2 independent methods: (1) measurement of denitrification and nutrient flux rates across the sediment-water interface, and (2) estimations of mass balance established on the basis of hydrodynamic modelling (MIKE 12). Annual N retention estimated by hydrodynamic modelling was 460 t N yr -1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
36
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest daily value in Gullmar Fjord (ϳ0.4 mmol N m Ϫ2 d Ϫ1 ) roughly equals the mean value for a number of Danish shallow fjords (ϳ0.6 mmol N m Ϫ2 d Ϫ1 , recalculated from annual values given by Dalsgaard et al (1999) and Nielsen et al (2001)). The denitrification rates at 10-15 m in Gullmar Fjord were only ϳ20-30% of those measured in situ by the N 2 /Ar method (1.2-2 mmol m Ϫ2 d Ϫ1 ) in sandy mid-Atlantic shelf sediments at 11-15 m in May and September (Laursen and Seitzinger 2002), and they were within the lower range of rates for other temperate continental shelves ( itive correlation between D tot and the C (r ϭ 0.567, P Ͻ 0.05) and N (r ϭ 0.560, P Ͻ 0.05) contents of the sediment also support this interpretation.…”
Section: Autotrophy and Heterotrophy Along The Depth Gradient-supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The highest daily value in Gullmar Fjord (ϳ0.4 mmol N m Ϫ2 d Ϫ1 ) roughly equals the mean value for a number of Danish shallow fjords (ϳ0.6 mmol N m Ϫ2 d Ϫ1 , recalculated from annual values given by Dalsgaard et al (1999) and Nielsen et al (2001)). The denitrification rates at 10-15 m in Gullmar Fjord were only ϳ20-30% of those measured in situ by the N 2 /Ar method (1.2-2 mmol m Ϫ2 d Ϫ1 ) in sandy mid-Atlantic shelf sediments at 11-15 m in May and September (Laursen and Seitzinger 2002), and they were within the lower range of rates for other temperate continental shelves ( itive correlation between D tot and the C (r ϭ 0.567, P Ͻ 0.05) and N (r ϭ 0.560, P Ͻ 0.05) contents of the sediment also support this interpretation.…”
Section: Autotrophy and Heterotrophy Along The Depth Gradient-supporting
confidence: 53%
“…For this set of data, the reported irradiance ranged between 2 and 1,300 mol photons m Ϫ2 s Ϫ1 . Denitrification was measured by the 15 N isotope pairing technique (Nielsen 1992;Risgaard-Petersen and Rysgaard 1995) and separated into coupled nitrification-denitrification (Dn) and denitrification of bottom-water NO (DW) as de-Ϫ 3 scribed by Nielsen (1992). For a detailed description of the sampling and incubation procedures applied, see the primary sources listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denitrification measurements: Denitrification was measured using the 15 N isotope pairing technique (Nielsen 1992): 15 N-labeled NO was added to the water in the reservoirs iglas tubes was replaced with reservoir water. Following an equilibrium period of ϳ4 : 1 h LD (Dalsgaard et al 2000b), the Plexiglas tubes were sealed and incubation was initiated.…”
Section: Btsimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During this state, strong salinity, pH and other physico-chemical gradients near the freshwater front increase the potential effects of geochemical processes such as adsorption/desorption and flocculation, contributing to the removal of sediment, organic matter and associated inorganic nutrients (Eyre and Twigg, 1997;Nielsen et al, 2001). The lower turbulence in the vicinity of the freshwater front allows catchment-derived sediment and organic matter to settle from the water column, the extent of deposition depending on factors such as land-use and catchment geology, the timing and size of the flow event, particle size, current velocities, and the position of the freshwater front, which is primarily influenced by river inflow and the tidal phase.…”
Section: Freshwater Pulsed/recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%