2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-010-9367-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Limitation of Phytoplankton Growth in New Zealand Lakes: Implications for Eutrophication Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…' Paterson et al (2011) also state that ''we are unaware of successful programs to limit eutrophication by restricting inputs of N, either alone or in combination with P.'' We located several examples of nutrient loading reductions, including N, that resulted in improved water quality and lower phytoplankton biomass (Vant and Gilliland 1991;James et al 1994;Kö hler et al 2005). Our analyses also support other studies showing that N load reductions should be pursued in lakes where background P is naturally high (Abell et al 2010;Finlay et al 2010) or where elevated N clearly favors bloom-forming and toxic cyanobacteria that do not fix N (Davis et al 2010). Furthermore, combined N and P management strategies present the most effective means for controlling eutrophication in diverse ecosystems along the freshwater-to-marine continuum (Conley et al 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…' Paterson et al (2011) also state that ''we are unaware of successful programs to limit eutrophication by restricting inputs of N, either alone or in combination with P.'' We located several examples of nutrient loading reductions, including N, that resulted in improved water quality and lower phytoplankton biomass (Vant and Gilliland 1991;James et al 1994;Kö hler et al 2005). Our analyses also support other studies showing that N load reductions should be pursued in lakes where background P is naturally high (Abell et al 2010;Finlay et al 2010) or where elevated N clearly favors bloom-forming and toxic cyanobacteria that do not fix N (Davis et al 2010). Furthermore, combined N and P management strategies present the most effective means for controlling eutrophication in diverse ecosystems along the freshwater-to-marine continuum (Conley et al 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Definition of a TN : TP ratiothreshold to indicate P or N limitation water bodies is reported to vary widely (Abell et al 2010). The mean TN : TP ratio, derived from average annual nutrient concentrations sampled between 2001 to 2010 in the reservoir, was 33 (range: 16-52), and BS with no nutrient removal through fish ponds X X X X SC4 BS with no sewage point sources from households X X X X SC5 BS with exclusion of pig nutrient loading X X X X SC6 BS with exclusion of duck and geese nutrient loading X X X X SC7 BS with inclusion of chicken nutrient loading X X X X X X SC8 BS with exclusion of all livestock nutrient loading X SC9 BS with implementation of buffer zones along waterways X X X X X SC10 BS with additional N at rice fields (556 kg N ha À1 yr À1 ) X X X X X SC11 BS with additional N at rice fields (805 kg N ha À1 yr À1 ) X X X X X therefore the primary producers are likely dominated by P limitation (i.e.…”
Section: Model Configuration and Watershed Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean TN : TP ratio, derived from average annual nutrient concentrations sampled between 2001 to 2010 in the reservoir, was 33 (range: 16-52), and BS with no nutrient removal through fish ponds X X X X SC4 BS with no sewage point sources from households X X X X SC5 BS with exclusion of pig nutrient loading X X X X SC6 BS with exclusion of duck and geese nutrient loading X X X X SC7 BS with inclusion of chicken nutrient loading X X X X X X SC8 BS with exclusion of all livestock nutrient loading X SC9 BS with implementation of buffer zones along waterways X X X X X SC10 BS with additional N at rice fields (556 kg N ha À1 yr À1 ) X X X X X SC11 BS with additional N at rice fields (805 kg N ha À1 yr À1 ) X X X X X therefore the primary producers are likely dominated by P limitation (i.e. TN : TP .15, Abell et al 2010) for the majority of time, while N limitation may occasionally occur. Hence, we additionally estimated the effects on the water quality of the Kaiping reservoir using the simple and widely used empirical model by Vollenweider and Kerekes (1982):…”
Section: Model Configuration and Watershed Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have showed that nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), especially availability of both, regulate phytoplankton production in lacustrine systems (Abell et al 2010;Xu et al 2010). Major nutrient sources come from external runoffs and internal nutrient loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%