2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics of a re-wetted shallow-flooded peatland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there remained a reasonable number (39) of studies in quality category 3 with low susceptibility to Table 7 Number of included wetlands by inflow type…”
Section: Fig 3 Location Of Included Wetland Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there remained a reasonable number (39) of studies in quality category 3 with low susceptibility to Table 7 Number of included wetlands by inflow type…”
Section: Fig 3 Location Of Included Wetland Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One included wetland showed a small (non-significant) negative TN removal rate [39]. This was a multi-purpose FWS wetland that had been restored on formerly drained cropland.…”
Section: Removal Of Tnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have shown that ponds and stormwater wetlands were less efficient at P retention than at retaining nitrogen (N) [5,6,13]. In some cases (e.g., in [7,13,14]), the SCMs were actually net sources of P to streams or rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the changes described in Lake Płotycze could be related mainly to changes in the amount and quality of the matter imported from the peat-bog catchment. A hypothetical return of peat bogs surrounding a lake to normal hydration could bring about a return of wetlands to their regular state of phosphorus retention (Reddy et al, 1999;Kieckbusch and Schrautzer, 2007). In the case of wetlands with Sphagnum, intensive retention of calcium also occurs (Hillbricht-Ilkowska et al, 1998;Hehmann et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%