2020
DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2019-0132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and phosphorus control carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems: modelling carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus balances at the Breton Plots with ecosys under historical and future climates

Abstract: Perennial legumes in crop rotations increase soil C sequestration from greater productivity with N2 fixation. Here, we corroborated increases in soil organic carbon (SOC) and harvests modelled in 5 yr wheat–oats–barley–alfalfa/brome–alfalfa/brome (5Y) vs. 2 yr wheat–fallow (WF) rotations with those measured from 1929 to 2018. Harvest and SOC gains of 100–150 g C m−2 yr−1 and 15–25 g C m−2 yr−1 were modelled and measured in 5Y vs. WF rotations with different fertilizer and manure amendments. Modelled gains were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since increases in NPP generate increases in plant litter, underestimation of litter C follows from the NPP underestimation by the ML model. Root and shoot litter is highly labile, so increases in litter C typically lead to increases in microbial respiration in field studies (Adamczyk et al 2020) and in the ecosys model (Grant et al 2020). Indeed, we find that litter C is the leading driver of ML underestimation of 21st century R h , with increases in ML R h bias strongly tied to increases in litter C in 40% of grid cells (figure 7).…”
Section: Model Cannot Predict Ecosystem Responses To Changing Co 2 At...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Since increases in NPP generate increases in plant litter, underestimation of litter C follows from the NPP underestimation by the ML model. Root and shoot litter is highly labile, so increases in litter C typically lead to increases in microbial respiration in field studies (Adamczyk et al 2020) and in the ecosys model (Grant et al 2020). Indeed, we find that litter C is the leading driver of ML underestimation of 21st century R h , with increases in ML R h bias strongly tied to increases in litter C in 40% of grid cells (figure 7).…”
Section: Model Cannot Predict Ecosystem Responses To Changing Co 2 At...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Seed number and kernel mass are set during pre‐ and post‐anthesis growth stages to determine the yield upon harvest (Grant et al., 2011). More details about the biophysical and biochemical processes in ecosys can be found in the supplement of Grant, Lin, and Hernandez‐Ramirez (2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological adaptation in the barley PFT was represented by raising the fractions of leaf proteins in rubisco and in mesophyll chlorophyll by 40%, which would simulate higher productivity and hence more rapid accumulation of grain biomasses in barley than in the wheat PFT in Grant et al (2011). These adjustments to the barley PFT in ecosys with respect to the wheat PFT were made based on relative performance between ecosys simulated barley and wheat yields, biomass growth, and nitrogen uptake, which were rigorously tested by Grant et al (2020) against Alberta field data. Typical soil, crop, and nutrient management practices and recommended N fertilizer rates across different regions of Alberta were used as model inputs (Figure 2; Table 1).…”
Section: Methodology and Model Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%