2019
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen addition does not reduce the role of spatial asynchrony in stabilising grassland communities

Abstract: While nitrogen (N) amendment is known to affect the stability of ecological communities, whether this effect is scale-dependent remains an open question. By conducting a field experiment in a temperate grassland, we found that both plant richness and temporal stability of community biomass increased with spatial scale, but N enrichment reduced richness and stability at the two scales considered. Reduced local-scale stability under N enrichment arose from N-induced reduction in population stability, which was p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
109
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(200 reference statements)
13
109
5
Order By: Relevance
“…6 ). Our results extend previous evidence of the negative impact of fertilization on the diversity–stability relationship obtained within local plots and over shorter experimental periods 4 , 6 , 26 . Importantly, they show that these negative effects propagate from within to among communities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6 ). Our results extend previous evidence of the negative impact of fertilization on the diversity–stability relationship obtained within local plots and over shorter experimental periods 4 , 6 , 26 . Importantly, they show that these negative effects propagate from within to among communities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Analyses of variance revealed the negative effects of nutrient inputs on biodiversity and stability at the two scales investigated, consistent with recent findings from a single site 26 . Fertilization consistently reduced species richness, alpha, and gamma stability, but had no effect on beta diversity (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study provides some of the first evidence to suggest that at macroscales, biomass is stabilized more by spatial variation in biomass fluctuations and species composition than average local stability or species diversity. Moreover, our results suggest recent theory on scaling biodiversity-stability relationships [25,29] (which has mostly been tested with sessile organisms like plants [26,46,47,71]) can be generalized to more mobile consumers like birds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, most prior tests of the importance of β-diversity and spatial asynchrony come from studies of plant communities at relatively small scalesmetacommunities less than 1 ha in size (median 0.5 ha) and/ or single grasslands [26,46,47]-which may not contain the abiotic heterogeneity or variation in species composition necessary to drive spatial asynchrony. Consistent with these expectations, these studies typically found local stability was more important than plant β-diversity or spatial asynchrony for stabilizing biomass at larger scales [26,47]. The lack of studies across heterogeneous ecosystems or outside of plant communities limits our understanding of how and why biodiversity contributes to ecosystem stability at large, regional scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%