Abstract:Abstract:The effective management of high ammonium containing wastewater is important for the sustainable development of the wastewater industry. A pre-denitrification and post-nitrification two-sludge system was proposed to treat high ammonium containing wastewater with low carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratios. In the system, pre-denitrification was adopted to use organic carbon in raw wastewater efficiently for nitrogen removal, while post-nitrification was adopted to achieve nitritation. System performance and t… Show more
“…The nitrification efficiencies did not significantly differ (P>0.05) between the high and low aeration periods, although nitrification was significantly affected by the aeration rate in an SBR process ). This inconsistency likely arises from the lower influent NH 4 + -N loading in this study than in the previous study (0.007 vs 0.289 kg N/m 3 /day; see Wu et al 2014). On the other hand, neither aeration condition significantly affected the DOC and DTN removal efficiencies (P>0.05), contradicting a previous finding that the DOC and DTN removal efficiencies depend on the aeration rates in an SBR .…”
Section: Effect Of Aeration Rates On Water Quality and N 2 O Emissionscontrasting
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is emitted from a modified Ludzak-Ettinger (MLE) process, as a primary activated sludge system, which requires mitigation. The effects of aeration rates and internal recycle flow (IRF) ratios on N2O emission were investigated in an MLE process fed with glycerol. Reducing the aeration rate from 1.5 to 0.5 L/min increased gaseous the N2O concentration from the aerobic tank and the dissolved N2O concentration in the anoxic tank by 54.4 and 53.4 %, respectively. During the period of higher aeration, the N2O-N conversion ratio was 0.9 % and the potential N2O reducers were predominantly Rhodobacter, which accounted for 21.8 % of the total population. Increasing the IRF ratio from 3.6 to 7.2 decreased the N2O emission rate from the aerobic tank and the dissolved N2O concentration in the anoxic tank by 56 and 48 %, respectively. This study suggests effective N2O mitigation strategies for MLE systems.
“…The nitrification efficiencies did not significantly differ (P>0.05) between the high and low aeration periods, although nitrification was significantly affected by the aeration rate in an SBR process ). This inconsistency likely arises from the lower influent NH 4 + -N loading in this study than in the previous study (0.007 vs 0.289 kg N/m 3 /day; see Wu et al 2014). On the other hand, neither aeration condition significantly affected the DOC and DTN removal efficiencies (P>0.05), contradicting a previous finding that the DOC and DTN removal efficiencies depend on the aeration rates in an SBR .…”
Section: Effect Of Aeration Rates On Water Quality and N 2 O Emissionscontrasting
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is emitted from a modified Ludzak-Ettinger (MLE) process, as a primary activated sludge system, which requires mitigation. The effects of aeration rates and internal recycle flow (IRF) ratios on N2O emission were investigated in an MLE process fed with glycerol. Reducing the aeration rate from 1.5 to 0.5 L/min increased gaseous the N2O concentration from the aerobic tank and the dissolved N2O concentration in the anoxic tank by 54.4 and 53.4 %, respectively. During the period of higher aeration, the N2O-N conversion ratio was 0.9 % and the potential N2O reducers were predominantly Rhodobacter, which accounted for 21.8 % of the total population. Increasing the IRF ratio from 3.6 to 7.2 decreased the N2O emission rate from the aerobic tank and the dissolved N2O concentration in the anoxic tank by 56 and 48 %, respectively. This study suggests effective N2O mitigation strategies for MLE systems.
“…Eldyasti, Nakhla, and Zhu () found that the biofilm thickness can play an important role in N 2 O emissions. Research has also investigated the potential for accumulation in nitrifying and denitrifying systems, and found that high concentration in both cases can lead to higher N 2 O emissions (Kampschreur, Temmink, Kleerebezem, Jetten, & van Loosdrecht, ; Lu & Chandran, ; Wu, Zheng, & Xing, ). However, these studies involved complex systems, in which the biofilm thicknesses, microbial composition, and substrate concentrations were not well characterized.…”
Nitrous oxide (N O) is a potent greenhouse gas that can be formed in wastewater treatment processes by ammonium oxidizing and denitrifying microorganisms. While N O emissions from suspended growth systems have been extensively studied, and some recent studies have addressed emissions from nitrifying biofilms, much less is known about N O emissions from denitrifying biofilm processes. This research used modeling to evaluate the mechanisms of N O formation and reduction in denitrifying biofilms. The kinetic model included formation and consumption of key denitrification species, including nitrate (NO3-), nitrite (NO2-), nitric oxide (NO), and N O. The model showed that, in presence of excess of electron donor, denitrifying biofilms have two distinct layers of activity: an outer layer where there is net production of N O and an inner layer where there is net consumption. The presence of oxygen (O ) had an important effect on N O emission from suspended growth systems, but a smaller effect on biofilm systems. The effects of NO3- and O differed significantly based on the biofilm thickness. Overall, the effects of biofilm thickness and bulk substrate concentrations on N O emissions are complex and not always intuitive. A key mechanism for denitrifying biofilms is the diffusion of N O and other intermediates from one zone of the biofilm to another. This leads to zones of N O formation or consumption transformations that would not exist in suspended growth systems.
“…In the last years, many efforts have been devoted towards the understanding of the key mechanisms involved in N 2 O production and emission (Kampschreur et al, 2009;Quan et al, 2012;Rodriguez-Caballero and Pijuan, 2013;Stenstr€ om et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2014;Hwang et al, 2016;Mannina et al, 2016c). The reported studies demonstrated a huge variability of the N 2 O emission (from the 0.01% to 10% of the influent total nitrogen) (Yoshida et al, 2014), depending on the WWTPs operational conditions (Kampschreur et al, 2009;Law et al, 2012;Daelman et al, 2013).…”
a b s t r a c tThe present paper reports the results of a nitrous oxide (N 2 O) production investigation in a moving bed based integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) membrane bioreactor (MBR) pilot plant designed in accordance with the University of Cape Town layout for biological phosphorous removal. Gaseous and liquid samples were collected in order to measure the gaseous as well as the dissolved concentration of N 2 O. Furthermore, the gas flow rate from each reactor was measured and the gas flux was estimated. The results confirmed that the anoxic reactor represents the main source of nitrous oxide production. A significant production of N 2 O was, however, also found in the anaerobic reactor, thus indicating a probable occurrence of the denitrifying phosphate accumulating organism activity. The highest N 2 O fluxes were emitted from the aerated reactors (3.09 g N 2 OeN m À2 h À1 and 9.87 g N 2 OeN m À2 h À1 , aerobic and MBR tank, respectively). The emission factor highlighted that only 1% of the total treated nitrogen was emitted from the pilot plant. Furthermore, the measured N 2 O concentrations in the permeate flow were comparable with other reactors. Nitrous oxide mass balances outlined a moderate production also in the MBR reactor despite the low hydraulic retention time. On the other hand, the mass balance showed that in the aerobic reactor a constant consumption of nitrous oxide (up to almost 15 mg N 2 O h À1 ) took place, due to the high amount of stripped gas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.