2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta06759a
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitride MXenes as sulfur hosts for thermodynamic and kinetic suppression of polysulfide shuttling: a computational study

Abstract: The practical applications of lithium-sulfur (Li–S) batteries are greatly hindered by the poor conductivity of sulfur, the shuttling of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), and the sluggish kinetics in charge-discharge process. In...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It reported that V 2 NS 2 has a good catalytic effect for SRR with a largest positive ΔG barrier value of 0.49 eV. 23 However, at the same time, the catalytic ability of V 2 NS 2 for decomposition of Li 2 S (1.19 eV) is much larger than that of Nb 2 CO 2 (0.558 eV). In terms of diffusion of Li + , the diffusion barrier value of Li + on the Nb 2 CO 2 substrate (0.231 eV) is between that of Ti 2 CO 2 (0.256 eV) and V 2 NO 2 (0.21 eV), and the decomposition barrier of Li 2 S catalyzed by Nb 2 CO 2 (0.558 eV) is also between that of Ti 2 CO 2 (0.565 eV) and V 2 NO 2 (1.55 eV), but the catalytic effect of Nb 2 CO 2 for SRR is the best.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It reported that V 2 NS 2 has a good catalytic effect for SRR with a largest positive ΔG barrier value of 0.49 eV. 23 However, at the same time, the catalytic ability of V 2 NS 2 for decomposition of Li 2 S (1.19 eV) is much larger than that of Nb 2 CO 2 (0.558 eV). In terms of diffusion of Li + , the diffusion barrier value of Li + on the Nb 2 CO 2 substrate (0.231 eV) is between that of Ti 2 CO 2 (0.256 eV) and V 2 NO 2 (0.21 eV), and the decomposition barrier of Li 2 S catalyzed by Nb 2 CO 2 (0.558 eV) is also between that of Ti 2 CO 2 (0.565 eV) and V 2 NO 2 (1.55 eV), but the catalytic effect of Nb 2 CO 2 for SRR is the best.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because in addition to the anchoring ability, the effect of MXenes hosts on the SRR during discharging and the decomposition of Li 2 S during charging should also be investigated. Recently, different functional V 2 NT 2 MXenes have been investigated which could accelerate the decomposition of Li 2 S and Li ion kinetics, especially S-terminated V 2 NS 2 has the lowest Gibbs free energy barrier (Δ G ) for SRR . However, the ability of V 2 NS 2 to catalyze the decomposition of Li 2 S is limited (1.19 eV), which is much higher than that of Ti-based MXenes (such as 0.411 eV for Ti 3 C 2 O 2 and 0.351 eV for Ti 3 C 2 S 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is further confirmed by calculating the ratio of chemical and physical interaction (Van der Waals force) according to the formula RvdW=()EadsvdWEadsitalicno0.25emitalicvdW/EadsvdW×100% (Figure 3G). 35 For MXene/graphene, the contribution of Van der Waals force increases sharply with sulfur atoms, approaching 100% for S 8 , which is opposite to the trend of adsorption energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…37,43 DFT computations predict that non-carbide MXenes exhibit properties superior to carbide MXenes, thus exhibiting the potential to be used in various elds. [44][45][46] A comprehensive overview of the synthesis methods adopted so far in producing non-carbide MXenes and their properties will be discussed in the subsequent sections of this review.…”
Section: Challenges In Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%