1998
DOI: 10.1029/98jd01356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric oxide production by simulated lightning: Dependence on current, energy, and pressure

Abstract: Abstract. The production of NO has been studied by means of arc discharges in the laboratory which simulate natural lightning in current waveform and amplitude (___ 30kA). Observations are compared to the results of a computational model that includes the dynamics of energy deposition and channel expansion, combined with the Zel'dovich equations to model the relevant chemical reactions. Results are expressed as NO produced per meter of arc length, and are measured as functions of dissipated energy and of peak … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
184
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
15
184
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But as long as the increased instantaneous DE is due to aboveaverage peak currents, we would also expect that the respective flashes have LNO x production P above average, since high current flashes also produce more LNO x . This is also an almost linear effect, as shown in Wang et al (1998). Thus, the observed discrepancy between FRD and NO 2 TSCD remains more or less the same, as both effects (the increase in DE, thus the decrease in FRD, and the increase in PE due to high-current flashes) cancel each other out largely.…”
Section: Wwllnsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But as long as the increased instantaneous DE is due to aboveaverage peak currents, we would also expect that the respective flashes have LNO x production P above average, since high current flashes also produce more LNO x . This is also an almost linear effect, as shown in Wang et al (1998). Thus, the observed discrepancy between FRD and NO 2 TSCD remains more or less the same, as both effects (the increase in DE, thus the decrease in FRD, and the increase in PE due to high-current flashes) cancel each other out largely.…”
Section: Wwllnsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…As a consequence of the Zel'dovich mechanism, PE increases with energy and peak current (Wang et al, 1998). Flashes of low peak current are thus less productive concerning LNO x .…”
Section: Factors Determining Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study P Range Method Levy et al (1996) 4.0 3.0-5.0 Top-down from aircraft NO x observations Ridley et al (1996) n.a. 2.0-5.0 Extrapolation of New Mexico storm production Price et al (1997a) 12.2 5.0-20.0 Bottom-up from ISCCP cloud climatology Price et al (1997b) 13.2 5.0-25.0 Constraints from atmospheric electricity Wang et al (1998) n.a. 2.5-8.3 Bottom-up from laboratory measurements Huntrieser et al (1998) 4.0 0.3-22.0 Extrapolation of LINOX storm production Nesbitt et al (2000) n.a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radius of the cylinder is taken from the area of high pressure due to thermal expansion. This area only reaches one to two centimeters across, so the radius of the cylinder is set at 0.01 m. A numerical simulation by Wang et al (1998) gave NO x production levels similar to experimental results when setting the radius of the leader core equal to this value. r = 0.01 m gives a cross-sectional area of 3.14 × 10 −4 m 2 , and a volume of 3.14 m 3 .…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 90%