1997
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric Oxide-Induced Modification of Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase with NAD+ Is Not ADP-Ribosylation

Abstract: One biological effect of nitric oxide (NO) has been believed to be exerted through induction of the ADP-ribosyltransferase activity of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Though this notion is based on the finding that NO increases the auto-ADP-ribosylation of GAPDH, controversial data have also been reported. To determine whether or not NO really activates ADP-ribosylation, we re-examined the NO-induced modification of GAPDH with NAD+. GAPDH was modified equally with [adenosine-14C]NAD+ and [car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such labeling, as observed in the case of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (29), can be misinterpreted as ADP-ribosylation of specific amino acid acceptors (29,30). We have observed low levels of nonspecific radiolabeling of proteins incubated in the presence of [ 32 P]NAD ϩ .…”
Section: Msirt6 Expression In Mice Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Such labeling, as observed in the case of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (29), can be misinterpreted as ADP-ribosylation of specific amino acid acceptors (29,30). We have observed low levels of nonspecific radiolabeling of proteins incubated in the presence of [ 32 P]NAD ϩ .…”
Section: Msirt6 Expression In Mice Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These authors also reported that NOmediated ADP-ribosylation of GAPDH inhibited this enzyme activity. Several investigators have questioned whether or not auto-ADP-ribosylation of GAPDH occurs as a result of stimulation by NO (McDonald & Moss, 1993 ;Itoga et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last several years, several studies have been published, showing a protective effect of nitric oxide in a variety of paradigms of cell injury and cell death. These include (1) direct scavenging of free radicals (Hogg et al, 1993 ; Wink et al, 1993) ; (2) effects on intracellular iron metabolism, including interaction with iron to form nitrosyl‐iron complexes (Rauhala et al., 1996 ; Sergent et al, 1997 ; Yoshie and Ohshima, 1997), preventing release of iron from ferritin (Puntarulo and Cederbaum, 1997), or stimulating iron‐responsive RNA binding elements such as cis ‐aconitase (Jaffrey et al, 1994) ; (3) inactivation of caspases (Dimmeler et al, 1997) ; (4) activation of a cyclic GMP‐dependent survival pathway, as has been seen in PC12 cells (Farinelli et al, 1996) and tumor necrosis factor‐α‐induced apoptosis in endothelial cells (Polte et al, 1997) ; (5) inducing expression of protective proteins such as heat shock proteins (Kim et al, 1997) ; (6) inhibition of nuclear factor‐κB activation (Peng et al, 1995 ; Matthews et al, 1996 ; Park et al, 1997 ; Togashi et al, 1997) ; (7) inhibition of glyceradehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (Dimmeler et al, 1992 ; Kots et al, 1992 ; Molina y Vedia et al, 1992 ; McDonald and Moss, 1993 ; Itoga et al, 1997), whose activity appears to be required in one paradigm of neuronal apoptosis (Ishitani et al, 1996) ; and (8) oxidation in neurons of a redox modulatory site on the NMDA receptor, resulting in a decrease in NMDA receptor‐mediated currents (Lei et al, 1992), a mechanism that remains controversial (Aizenman et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%