1997
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.17-07-02645.1997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric Oxide Facilitates Long-Term Potentiation, But Not Long-Term Depression

Abstract: Reports that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition prevents the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) have been controversial. Recent evidence suggests that NO may help to regulate the threshold for LTP induction. We have tested this hypothesis by examining the effects of stimulus frequency and train duration on synaptic plasticity in the presence of either NO donors or NOS inhibitors. Two different NO donors facilitated LTP induction by stimuli that normally produced only short-term potentiation, whereas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
52
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the high concentration of L-NAME used in our experiments inhibits the induction of LTP by some protocols (Böhme et al 1991;Haley et al 1992;Ko and Kelly 1999), the results shown in Figure 3B suggest that the inhibition of additional LTP induction at potentiated synapses does not arise from mechanisms that require NO production. Furthermore, the lack of an effect of L-NAME on the amount of LTP induced by the first train of 5-Hz stimulation in these experiments indicates that 5-Hz stimulation induces an NO-independent form of LTP in the CA1 region of the hippocampus (at least during the first 20 min after 5-Hz stimulation), a finding consistent with previous observations that NO is not required for the induction of LTP by some patterns of synaptic stimulation (Gribkoff and Lum-Ragan 1992;Chetkovich et al 1993;Haley et al 1993;Malen and Chapman 1997).…”
Section: A No-dependent Inhibition Of Nmda Receptor Activity Is Not Rsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Because the high concentration of L-NAME used in our experiments inhibits the induction of LTP by some protocols (Böhme et al 1991;Haley et al 1992;Ko and Kelly 1999), the results shown in Figure 3B suggest that the inhibition of additional LTP induction at potentiated synapses does not arise from mechanisms that require NO production. Furthermore, the lack of an effect of L-NAME on the amount of LTP induced by the first train of 5-Hz stimulation in these experiments indicates that 5-Hz stimulation induces an NO-independent form of LTP in the CA1 region of the hippocampus (at least during the first 20 min after 5-Hz stimulation), a finding consistent with previous observations that NO is not required for the induction of LTP by some patterns of synaptic stimulation (Gribkoff and Lum-Ragan 1992;Chetkovich et al 1993;Haley et al 1993;Malen and Chapman 1997).…”
Section: A No-dependent Inhibition Of Nmda Receptor Activity Is Not Rsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Both GC inhibitor ODQ and PKG inhibitor KT5823 inhibited the enhancement of LTP by YC-1, suggesting that the NO-cGMP-PKG pathway mediated the influence of YC-1 on synaptic plasticity. It has been demonstrated that NO may be particularly important in regulating the threshold of LTP induction, because NOS inhibitors blocked LTP induced by weak, but not strong, afferent stimulation in CA1 (O'Dell et al, 1994;Malen and Chapman, 1997;Zhuo et al, 1998;Lu et al, 1999). Here we showed that YC-1 induced LTP at weak tetanus by amplifying the signal transduction of NO, indicating that YC-1 also lowers the threshold for LTP induction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Administration of exogenous NO paired with a weak tetanic stimulation of afferent fibers generates an NMDA receptorindependent LTP (Zhuo et al, 1993;Malen and Chapman, 1997;Bon and Garthwaite, 2003), a result that fulfils a key prediction of the retrograde messenger hypothesis. Surprisingly, however, for exogenous NO to potentiate synaptic transmission in this way, a source of endogenous NO was needed, both before and after the pairing protocol (Bon and Garthwaite, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%