2016
DOI: 10.15171/ehem.2016.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate removal from water using alum and ferric chloride: A comparative study of alum and ferric chloride efficiency

Abstract: Background: Nitrate is an acute and well-known hazardous contaminant, and its contamination of water sources has been a growing concern worldwide in recent years. This study evaluated the feasibility of nitrate removal from water using the traditional coagulants alum and ferric chloride with lower concentrations than those used in the conventional coagulation process. Methods: In this research, two coagulants, alum and ferric chloride, were compared for their efficiency in removing nitrate in a conventional wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that a lower current does not provide enough iron ion to completely destabilize the suspended oxide particles (35). Based on Faraday's law, an increase in the current density and reaction time increases the amount of iron hydroxides, resulting in higher removal efficiency of COD and turbidity via co-precipitation and sweep coagulation (36,37). Similar to the COD removal mechanism, increasing the current density and reaction time can increase phosphate removal efficiency by adsorption into the iron hydroxide, as well as precipitation of metal phosphate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our results show that a lower current does not provide enough iron ion to completely destabilize the suspended oxide particles (35). Based on Faraday's law, an increase in the current density and reaction time increases the amount of iron hydroxides, resulting in higher removal efficiency of COD and turbidity via co-precipitation and sweep coagulation (36,37). Similar to the COD removal mechanism, increasing the current density and reaction time can increase phosphate removal efficiency by adsorption into the iron hydroxide, as well as precipitation of metal phosphate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It has been reported that iron coagulants has a higher performance efficiency than magnesium coagulants in the removal efficiency of arsenic (III) and (V) from aqueous arsenic spiked sample, and it was observed that background ionic species such as Cland NO3has no effective on the removal efficiency of arsenic while SO4 2has a pronounce lowering effect on the removal efficiency of arsenic [19][20][21]. Both Fe2(SO4)3 and Al2(SO4)3 have be confirmed to have a high efficiency in the removal of total dissolved solids, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD) and turbidity but ferric chloride has a higher efficiency than aluminum sulfate in the removal of both nitrate and total organic carbon from wastewater [21][22][23].…”
Section: Chemical Treatment Methods -Coagulation/ Flocculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coagulation is useful to remove removes colloids and suspended solids from the water [2]. After that during flocculation, the particles are attracted together by van der Waal's forces, forming floc [1] [16]. Aluminium sulfate and Ferric chloride were tested as conventional coagulants [11].…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%