2006
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate promotes biological oxidation of sulfide in wastewaters: Experiment at plant-scale

Abstract: Biogenic production of sulfide in wastewater treatment plants involves odors, toxicity and corrosion problems. The production of sulfide is a consequence of bacterial activity, mainly sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). To prevent this production, the efficiency of nitrate addition to wastewater was tested at plant-scale by dosing concentrated calcium nitrate (Nutriox) in the works inlet. Nutriox dosing resulted in a sharp decrease of sulfide, both in the air and in the bulk water, reaching maximum decreases of 9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These bacteria showed enhancement or inhibition during nitrate addition. Bacteria belonging to the Alphaproteobacteria (Agrobacterium), Firmicutes (within the Clostridiales), Betaproteobacteria (Burkholderiales), and Actinobacteria (Streptomyces) were detected as being positively The bacteria identified during this study do not correspond to major nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria, as expected from a previous study (8). We have detected mainly heterotrophic bacteria generally reported in wastewaters but with scarce potential to decipher critical nutrient-cycling steps other that organic carbon decomposition.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These bacteria showed enhancement or inhibition during nitrate addition. Bacteria belonging to the Alphaproteobacteria (Agrobacterium), Firmicutes (within the Clostridiales), Betaproteobacteria (Burkholderiales), and Actinobacteria (Streptomyces) were detected as being positively The bacteria identified during this study do not correspond to major nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria, as expected from a previous study (8). We have detected mainly heterotrophic bacteria generally reported in wastewaters but with scarce potential to decipher critical nutrient-cycling steps other that organic carbon decomposition.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In a scenario dominated by heterotrophic bacteria, those representing a minor portion of the communities studied would only be occasionally detected using domainwide primer pairs. The proportion of Sulfurimonas-like relatives detected using group-specific primers by García de Lomas et al (8) constituted, at most, 0.1% of the total bacterial community. These results are in agreement with the high bacterial diversity reported in wastewaters (1,9,24) and indicate that DD-DGGE is a useful method to comparatively analyze the abundant members of bacterial communities from different treatments or sampling series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These cultures were chosen as they have previously been reported in similar ambient conditions [6,31,32]. The biofilter samples (lines 3, 4 and 5) did not have bands similar to those of the pure cultures of lines 1 and 2.…”
Section: Dgge Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Una descripción más detallada de la EDAR-"Guadalete" puede encontrarse en la literatura [12] . Las probetas se emplazaron en los canales mediante perchas construidas en aluminio con una capacidad de 8 probetas (2 de cada aleación), sostenidas mediante aislantes eléctricos de cerámica para prevenir interferencias galvánicas.…”
Section: áRea De Estudio Puntos De Muestreo Y Probetas De Acero Inoxunclassified