Proceedings of International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry 2007
DOI: 10.2523/106178-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate-Based Souring Mitigation of Produced Water—Side Effects and Challenges From the Draugen Produced-Water Reinjection Pilot

Abstract: fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractCurrently, the application of nitrate/nitrite is considered one of the most promising souring mitigation solutions during Produced Water Re-Injection (PWRI). Norske Shell tested nitrate based souring mitigation as part of a PWRI feasibility study in the Draugen field. Prior to the pilot, the application of both nitrite and nitrate had been tested on Draugen using a Souring Mitigation Cabinet (SMC) specially developed to mimic the microbial activity in the near well reservoir. From … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of nitrate in sour above-ground facilities of an oil field in the North Sea indicated increased corrosion rates, suggesting the formation of sulphur (Vik et al, 2007). Formation of corrosive elemental sulphur is not a problem at the injection end of an oil field, where waters enter the subsurface formation, but is clearly not desired at the production end where treated waters enter the pipeline system.…”
Section: Reaction Of Iron With Sulphur or Sulphidementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Use of nitrate in sour above-ground facilities of an oil field in the North Sea indicated increased corrosion rates, suggesting the formation of sulphur (Vik et al, 2007). Formation of corrosive elemental sulphur is not a problem at the injection end of an oil field, where waters enter the subsurface formation, but is clearly not desired at the production end where treated waters enter the pipeline system.…”
Section: Reaction Of Iron With Sulphur or Sulphidementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Waters produced from Ekofisk, a high-temperature North Sea oil field (19), contained 136 to 152 mg/liter of acetate, up to 14 mg/liter of propionate, up to 27 mg/liter of butyrate, and 800 to 1,100 mg/liter of sulfate, the high concentration being due to seawater injection (6). Lower VFA concentrations were reported in produced water from the Draugen field in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea with a downhole temperature of 71°C with 3 to 10 mg/liter of acetate, 1 to 11 mg/liter of propionate, less than 2 mg/liter of butyrate, and 400 to 600 mg/liter of sulfate (33). Interestingly, the field from which the samples used in the current study were obtained also had very high sulfate concentrations (Table 2), despite not being injected with seawater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concluding remarks are outlined in Section 5. Vented gas Figure 1: Process flow diagram of the processing plant of the Norwegian Sea offshore platform investigated in this work, based on data available at [26][27][28][29][30][31] and input by Norske Shell A/S. Reservoir fluid, oil and condensate streams are indicated in brown, gas streams in orange, produced water in green, seawater in blue and glycol in indigo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%