2007
DOI: 10.1080/19315775.2007.11721402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NIST Primary Frequency Standards and the Realization of the SI Second

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of our energy calculations are summarized in Table I. Columns 2-7 of Table I give the lowest-order DF energies E (0) , secondorder and third-order Coulomb correlation energies E (2) and E (3) , first-order and second-order Breit corrections B (1) and B (2) , and an estimated Lamb shift contribution, E (LS) . The Lamb shift E (LS) is calculated as the sum of the one-electron self energy and the first-order vacuum-polarization energy.…”
Section: Energy Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of our energy calculations are summarized in Table I. Columns 2-7 of Table I give the lowest-order DF energies E (0) , secondorder and third-order Coulomb correlation energies E (2) and E (3) , first-order and second-order Breit corrections B (1) and B (2) , and an estimated Lamb shift contribution, E (LS) . The Lamb shift E (LS) is calculated as the sum of the one-electron self energy and the first-order vacuum-polarization energy.…”
Section: Energy Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present relative standard uncertainty of Cs microwave frequency standard is around 4 × 10 −16 [1]. More precise frequency standards will open ways to more sensitive quantum-based standards for applications such as measurements of the fundamental constants and testing of physics postulates, inertial navigation, magnetometry, gravity gradiometry, and tracking of deepspace probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-level systems manipulated by electromagnetic waves are the fundamental building blocks in many applications, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [1] and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) microscopy, atomic clocks [2,3] and interferometers [4,5], magnetometry with atoms [6] or NV centers in diamonds [7] and quantum information processing with atoms, ions, quantum dots or superconducting qubits [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present relative standard uncertainty of the Cs microwave frequency standard is approximately 4 × 10 −16 [1]. The operation of atomic clocks is generally carried out at room temperature, whereas the definition of the second refers to the clock transition in an atom at absolute zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant recent progress in optical spectroscopy and measurement techniques has led to the achievement of relative standard uncertainties in optical frequency standards that are comparable to the Cs microwave benchmark. In 2006, the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) recommended that the following transitions frequencies be used as secondary representations of the second [5]: ground-state hyperfine microwave transition in 87 Rb [6], [7], 5s 2 S 1/2 − 4d 2 D 5/2 optical transition of the 88 Sr + ion [8], [9], 5d 10 6s 2 S 1/2 (F = 0) − 5d 9 6s 2 2 D 5/2 (F = 2) optical transition in 199 Hg + ion [10], [11], 6s 2 S 1/2 (F = 0) − 5d 2 D 5/2 (F = 2) optical transition in 171 Yb + ion [12], [13] and 5s 2 1 S 0 − 5s5p 3 P 0 transition in 87 Sr neutral atom [14], 1 Email: msafrono@udel.edu [15], [16]. With better stability and accuracy, as well as extremely low systematic perturbations, such optical frequency standards can reach a systematic fractional uncertainty of order 10 −18 [9], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%