Abstract:The structural, spectroscopic, and thermochemical properties of three polyatomic molecules with internal rotation—HNO3(g), H2SO4(g), and H2O2(g)—have been reviewed. Three revised ideal gas thermodynamic tables result from this critical examination. The revisions involved the consideration of new spectroscopic information and the use of theoretical results to model the internal rotation in the H2SO4 molecule. Compared to previous calculations, the entropies at 298.15 K are unchanged for HNO3 and H2O2, but the h… Show more
“…As expected by the predicted energy for the reaction (1) reported in table 4, the agreement between our calculated enthalpy of formation at 0 K for H 2 SO 4 (g) and the assessed value by Dorofeeva et al [33] is poor. However, it should be mentioned that in their work Dorofeeva tested a variety of computational methods to calculate the enthalpy of formation of the gaseous sulfuric acid and found in all cases a smaller value compared to experiments.…”
Section: So 3 (H 2 O) N (N = 1 To 3) and H 2 So 4 (H 2 O) M (M = 1 Tomentioning
confidence: 42%
“…The predicted vibrational frequencies are in satisfactory agreement with the available experimental data. In particular for H 2 O, SO 3 , H 2 SO 4 the average deviation is 5.0% [35], 6.2% [35] and 4.4% [33], respectively. For the hydrated complexes the only partial comparison can be made for H 2 SO 4 (H 2 O) with IR-matrix isolation measurements by Givan [14].…”
Section: So 3 (H 2 O) N (N = 1 To 3) and H 2 So 4 (H 2 O) M (M = 1 Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The used G.e.f. polynomial formula is the following: Also the calculated coefficients of a similar polynomial fit of the H 2 SO 4 (g) Gibbs energy functions assessed in [33] are shown in table 3.…”
Section: So 3 (H 2 O) N (N = 1 To 3) and H 2 So 4 (H 2 O) M (M = 1 Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the condensed species (H 2 SO 4 (l), H 2 O(l)) data were taken from [32]. Among all the gaseous molecules, apart the well known H 2 SO 4 (g) [33], SO 3 (g) [34], SO 2 (g) [34], O 2 (g) [32], H 2 O(g) [32], SO(g) [32] and H 2 S(g) [32], also many other minor gas species were considered in the database: H, HO, HSO, SOH, HO 2 , HS, H 2 , H 2 SO, HSOH, H 2 O 2 , H 2 S 2 , O, O 3 , S, S 2 , S 3 , S 4 , S 5 , S 6 , S 7 , S 8 ; their thermodynamics were taken from [32]. In the thermodynamic calculations also the gaseous coordination complexes SO 3 2 have been considered.…”
“…As expected by the predicted energy for the reaction (1) reported in table 4, the agreement between our calculated enthalpy of formation at 0 K for H 2 SO 4 (g) and the assessed value by Dorofeeva et al [33] is poor. However, it should be mentioned that in their work Dorofeeva tested a variety of computational methods to calculate the enthalpy of formation of the gaseous sulfuric acid and found in all cases a smaller value compared to experiments.…”
Section: So 3 (H 2 O) N (N = 1 To 3) and H 2 So 4 (H 2 O) M (M = 1 Tomentioning
confidence: 42%
“…The predicted vibrational frequencies are in satisfactory agreement with the available experimental data. In particular for H 2 O, SO 3 , H 2 SO 4 the average deviation is 5.0% [35], 6.2% [35] and 4.4% [33], respectively. For the hydrated complexes the only partial comparison can be made for H 2 SO 4 (H 2 O) with IR-matrix isolation measurements by Givan [14].…”
Section: So 3 (H 2 O) N (N = 1 To 3) and H 2 So 4 (H 2 O) M (M = 1 Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The used G.e.f. polynomial formula is the following: Also the calculated coefficients of a similar polynomial fit of the H 2 SO 4 (g) Gibbs energy functions assessed in [33] are shown in table 3.…”
Section: So 3 (H 2 O) N (N = 1 To 3) and H 2 So 4 (H 2 O) M (M = 1 Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the condensed species (H 2 SO 4 (l), H 2 O(l)) data were taken from [32]. Among all the gaseous molecules, apart the well known H 2 SO 4 (g) [33], SO 3 (g) [34], SO 2 (g) [34], O 2 (g) [32], H 2 O(g) [32], SO(g) [32] and H 2 S(g) [32], also many other minor gas species were considered in the database: H, HO, HSO, SOH, HO 2 , HS, H 2 , H 2 SO, HSOH, H 2 O 2 , H 2 S 2 , O, O 3 , S, S 2 , S 3 , S 4 , S 5 , S 6 , S 7 , S 8 ; their thermodynamics were taken from [32]. In the thermodynamic calculations also the gaseous coordination complexes SO 3 2 have been considered.…”
“…According to the published thermodynamic data [17], the possible reactions and their accompanying free-energy changes in the Al-ZrO 2 -B system can be written as the following equations.…”
In situ (α-Al 2 O 3 +ZrB 2 )/Al composites with network distribution were fabricated using low-energy ball milling and reaction hot pressing. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) was used to study the reaction mechanisms in the Al-ZrO 2 -B system. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in conjunction with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) were used to investigate the composite phases, morphology, and microstructure of the composites. The effect of matrix network size on the microstructure and mechanical properties was investigated. The results show that the optimum sintering parameters to complete reactions in the Al-ZrO 2 -B system are 850°C and 60 min. In situ-synthesized α-Al 2 O 3 and ZrB 2 particles are dispersed uniformly around Al particles, forming a network microstructure; the diameters of the α-Al 2 O 3 and ZrB 2 particles are approximately 1-3 μm. When the size of Al powder increases from 60-110 μm to 150-300 μm, the overall surface contact between Al powders and reactants decreases, thereby increasing the local volume fraction of reinforcements from 12% to 21%. This increase of the local volume leads to a significant increase in microhardness of the in situ (α-Al 2 O 3 -ZrB 2 )/Al composites from Hv 163 to Hv 251.
A detailed and accurate combustion reaction mechanism is crucial for understanding the nature of fuel combustion. In this work, a theoretical study of reaction HCCO+HO2 using M06‐2X/6‐311++G(d,p) for geometry optimization and combined methods based on spin‐unrestricted CCSD(T)/CBS level of theory with basis set extrapolation from MP2/aug‐cc‐pVnZ (n=T and Q) for energy calculations were performed. The temperature‐ and pressure‐dependent rate coefficients at 300–2000 K and 0.01–100 atm, suitable for combustion conditions, were derived using the Rice–Ramsberger–Kassel–Marcus/Master–Equation approach. Furthermore, temperature‐dependent thermochemistry data of key species for the HCCO+HO2 system has also been studied. Finally, an updated ketene model is developed by supplementing the most recent theoretical work and the theoretical work in this paper. This updated model was tested to simulate the speciation of ketene oxidation in available experimental research. It is shown that the updated model for predicting ketene oxidation exhibits a high level of agreement with experimental data across a wide range of species profiles. An analysis was conducted to identify the crucial reactions that influence ketene ignition. This paper‘s research findings are essential for enhancing the combustion mechanism of ketene and other hydrocarbons and oxygenated hydrocarbon fuels.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.