2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.074801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nishikawa Prize article: Electron lenses, Tevatron, and selected topics in accelerators

Abstract: This article is an extended version of the talk is given at the IPAC19 (Melbourne, Australia, May 2019) on the occasion of acceptance of the ACFA/IPAC19 Nishikawa Tetsuji Prize for a recent, significant, original contribution to the accelerator field, with no age limit with citation "…for original work on electron lenses in synchrotron colliders, outstanding contribution to the construction and operation of high-energy, high-luminosity hadron colliders and for tireless leadership in the accelerator community."

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two years later an ultimate √ s = 100 TeV μp collider (with an additional 50 TeV proton ring in the √ s = 100 TeV muon collider tunnel) was suggested in [10]. It should be noted that luminosities of μp collisions in [7] and [8] were overestimated by 3 and 1 order of magnitudes, respectively (see subsects. 3.2 and 2.3 in [10]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two years later an ultimate √ s = 100 TeV μp collider (with an additional 50 TeV proton ring in the √ s = 100 TeV muon collider tunnel) was suggested in [10]. It should be noted that luminosities of μp collisions in [7] and [8] were overestimated by 3 and 1 order of magnitudes, respectively (see subsects. 3.2 and 2.3 in [10]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TeV energy muon-proton colliders [7,8] were proposed two decades ago as alternatives to linac-HERA-and linac-LHC-based ep/γp colliders (see review [9] and references therein). Two years later an ultimate √ s = 100 TeV μp collider (with an additional 50 TeV proton ring in the √ s = 100 TeV muon collider tunnel) was suggested in [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%