2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NINA-LAMP compared to microscopy, RDT, and nested PCR for the detection of imported malaria

Abstract: Microscopy and field adaptable rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are not sensitive and specific in certain conditions such as poor training of microscopists, lack of electricity, or the inability to detect non-falciparum malaria. More sensitive point of care testing (POCT) would reduce delays in diagnosis and initiation of therapy. In the current study, we have evaluated the efficacy of non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification (NINA) coupled with LAMP for detection of traveler’s malaria (n = 140) in comparison … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LAMP-based methods for the detection of malaria have been available on a researchuse-only basis for over a decade (28). Results from studies performed both in settings where malaria is endemic and where it is not endemic have suggested that LAMP is more sensitive than rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) such as the BinaxNOW malaria test, especially for the non-falciparum species (13,17,30,35). LAMP appears to perform on an equal footing with other molecular techniques such as nested PCR (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LAMP-based methods for the detection of malaria have been available on a researchuse-only basis for over a decade (28). Results from studies performed both in settings where malaria is endemic and where it is not endemic have suggested that LAMP is more sensitive than rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) such as the BinaxNOW malaria test, especially for the non-falciparum species (13,17,30,35). LAMP appears to perform on an equal footing with other molecular techniques such as nested PCR (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from studies performed both in settings where malaria is endemic and where it is not endemic have suggested that LAMP is more sensitive than rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) such as the BinaxNOW malaria test, especially for the non-falciparum species (13,17,30,35). LAMP appears to perform on an equal footing with other molecular techniques such as nested PCR (35). LAMP may be especially useful for the screening of low-level parasitemia due to its analytical sensitivity (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further facilitate the field use of isothermal amplification techniques in resource-limited settings, PATH developed an inexpensive, highly efficient, and electricity-free non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification (NINA) system that is based on an exothermic reaction between common salt and Mg-Fe mechanical alloy [5055]. We describe here the development of a novel RT-LAMP technique that is based on detection of a high-abundant Plasmodium falciparum transcript in parasite RNA extracts or infected whole blood lysates using commercially available single enzyme systems and the NINA approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un estudio realizado en Colombia indica que a través de este método de microscopía, la sensibilidad es 93% y especificidad es 98,7% para P. falciparum, mientras que para P. vivax, la sensibilidad es 98% y la especificidad es 97, 9% [29]. Dentro de las dificultades que presenta este método es que solamente detecta parasitemias mayores a 50 parásitos/μL, y no permite detectar coinfecciones; esta incapacidad de detectar infecciones con baja carga de pará-sitos sanguíneos, conduce al no tratamiento de los pacientes y por ende al progreso de la enfermedad [30,31].…”
Section: Métodos Microscópicosunclassified