2006
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0606247103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NikR–operator complex structure and the mechanism of repressor activation by metal ions

Abstract: Metal ion homeostasis is critical to the survival of all cells. Regulation of nickel concentrations in Escherichia coli is mediated by the NikR repressor via nickel-induced transcriptional repression of the nickel ABC-type transporter, NikABCDE. Here, we report two crystal structures of nickel-activated E. coli NikR, the isolated repressor at 2.1 Å resolution and in a complex with its operator DNA sequence from the nik promoter at 3.1 Å resolution. Along with the previously published structure of apo-NikR, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
342
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
12
342
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater spacing between half-sites is a consequence of the C-terminal nickel-binding domain, which is physically interposed between the RHH domains in the DNA complex. The DNA duplexes of many of the RHH-DNA cocrystal structures are bent to varying degrees (Arc, 50°(25); MetJ, 50°(24); CopG, 60° (29); FitA, 44°(52); EcNikR, 22° (27); ParR, 46°(53)), which further supports the idea that RHH proteins with different ␤-sheet motifs require variations in flanking DNA structure for optimal DNA binding. It is likely, then, that models of RHH protein-DNA interactions need to be expanded to include the analysis of DNA structural specificity outside of the minimal binding sites often predicted from lower resolution experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The greater spacing between half-sites is a consequence of the C-terminal nickel-binding domain, which is physically interposed between the RHH domains in the DNA complex. The DNA duplexes of many of the RHH-DNA cocrystal structures are bent to varying degrees (Arc, 50°(25); MetJ, 50°(24); CopG, 60° (29); FitA, 44°(52); EcNikR, 22° (27); ParR, 46°(53)), which further supports the idea that RHH proteins with different ␤-sheet motifs require variations in flanking DNA structure for optimal DNA binding. It is likely, then, that models of RHH protein-DNA interactions need to be expanded to include the analysis of DNA structural specificity outside of the minimal binding sites often predicted from lower resolution experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…2e, gray boxes), consistent with the location of Asn 20 at the end of helix ␣1 and near the two edges of the antiparallel ␤-sheet (Fig. 1b) (27). Because HpNikR binds to DNA as a tetramer, the presence of more than four cleavage regions suggests that each modified Cys adopted more than one conformation.…”
Section: Hpnikr Rhh Domain Conformations Are Different On the Nixa Anmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the residues highlighted by the RI analysis with the residues that contact DNA or/and make dimer-dimer contacts in the available crystal structures of RHH proteins in complex with DNA, i.e. CopG, Arc, Omega, FitA, MetJ, and NikR (52,53,58,59,67,68), we identified the DNA contacting or dimerdimer contacting residues and color-coded the structurally equivalent residues of SvtR accordingly (supplemental Fig. S7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NikR, the representative regulator of NikR-type transcription factors, consists of the N-terminal RHH domain and the C-terminal Ni 2+ -binding domain. [58][59][60][61] uptake at low concentrations of Zn 2+ .…”
Section: Modementioning
confidence: 99%