2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2979239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nighttime Data Augmentation Using GAN for Improving Blind-Spot Detection

Abstract: Camera-based blind-spot detection systems improve the shortcomings of radar-based systems for accurately detecting the position of a vehicle. However, as with many camera-based applications, the detection performance is insufficient in a low-illumination environment such as at night. This problem can be solved with augmented nighttime images in the training data but acquiring them and annotating the additional images are cumbersome tasks. Therefore, we propose a framework that converts daytime images into synt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experimental results, DG-Net achieved gains of 8.3% and 10.3% mAP on Market-1501 and DukeMTMC-reID, respectively, indicating the advantage of the proposed joint learning. In [52], Lee et al proposed an any-time-of day camera-based BSD system and generated a synthetic nighttime side-rectilinear images to improve the nighttime performance of the hand-crafted feature-based BSD system. The framework with a conditional GAN for data augmentation was built, and the nighttime detection performance was improved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experimental results, DG-Net achieved gains of 8.3% and 10.3% mAP on Market-1501 and DukeMTMC-reID, respectively, indicating the advantage of the proposed joint learning. In [52], Lee et al proposed an any-time-of day camera-based BSD system and generated a synthetic nighttime side-rectilinear images to improve the nighttime performance of the hand-crafted feature-based BSD system. The framework with a conditional GAN for data augmentation was built, and the nighttime detection performance was improved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FteGanOd + Faster RCNN) either outperforms or achieves similar detection rates on more complex datasets compared with existing methods on lower complexity datasets. The method of [22] achieved a precision of 97.1% and a recall of 55.0%. Our method (FteGanOd + Faster RCNN) achieve a higher precision of 97.8% at the same recall.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most methods were evaluated using low-density traffic conditions and lowcomplexity backgrounds. The datasets we used (DATASET1 (easy) and DATASET2) contain an average of 5 target vehicles per image, and are more complex than those private datasets [1], [13], [14], [15], [24], [22]. Our method can adapt to different light conditions under natural driving conditions.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of GAN [53], more and more data augmentation technologies based on developed GAN have been proposed. In [54], a framework that converts daytime images into synthetic nighttime images based on a generative adversarial network was proposed, the generative adversarial network was trained on a public dataset and the experiment in a real nighttime dataset demonstrated that the performance of the model develops a lot due to augmented dataset. In [55], a generative adversarial network was used to generate real traffic sign images and the experiment demonstrated that the augmented dataset could develop the performance of the model, however, compared to GAN data augmentation, some traditional augmentation techniques could have a better performance which means that GAN is can be naively used for data augmentation but is not always the best choice.…”
Section: Methods For Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%