2016
DOI: 10.1177/1077699016628806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Night and Day

Abstract: This study analyzes letters to the editor in two Oklahoma newspapers during the debate over a constitutional amendment banning judicial use of the Islamic moral code called “Shariah Law.” Using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) to operationalize the moral evaluations in media framing, three morality-based frames were identified: a Patriot frame emphasizing Shariah’s harms, a Heritage frame advocating loyalty to the American Way, and a Golden Rule frame promoting equal treatment of Muslims. Each frame was related … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have tried to address these limitations by using manual coding in addition to the raw word frequencies (e.g. Bowe & Hoewe, 2016;Clifford & Jerit, 2013;Graham et al, 2009). Another approach to improve the power of the analysis is to use more sophisticated techniques to extract moral foundations usage from text sources (e.g.…”
Section: Limitations and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have tried to address these limitations by using manual coding in addition to the raw word frequencies (e.g. Bowe & Hoewe, 2016;Clifford & Jerit, 2013;Graham et al, 2009). Another approach to improve the power of the analysis is to use more sophisticated techniques to extract moral foundations usage from text sources (e.g.…”
Section: Limitations and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software counts virtue and vice terms related to the five foundations and calculates a score that is a percentage of foundation terms in each text (Graham et al, 2009). This is a technique that has been used in previous research to determine moral foundations in texts (Bowe & Hoewe, 2016; Clifford & Jerit, 2013; Dehghani, Sagae, Sachdeva, & Gratch, 2014; Garten, Boghrati, Hoover, Johnson, & Dehghani, 2016; Graham et al, 2009; Jairam, 2012; Motyl, 2012; Sagi & Dehghani, 2014; Teernstra, van der Putten, Noordegraaf-Eelens, & Verbeek, 2016), thus replicating a well-established method. Lacy et al (2015) argued that algorithmic textual analysis tools (such as LIWC) are best used in studies of well-archived digital data in contexts (such as digitized newspaper stories storied in databases) that are concerned with explicitly manifest variables (like the ones in the MFT dictionary for LIWC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique also removes the researcher one step from the frame identification process. The cluster method has gained popularity in recent years and has been endorsed and/or adopted by other researchers (Bell & Entman, 2011; Bowe & Hoewe, 2016; Bowe, Oshita, Terracina-Hartman, & Chao, 2012; Donk, Metag, Kohring, & Marcinkowski, 2012; Van Gorp, 2010). However, the approach has been critiqued for its reliance on manifest content as a trade-off of validity (B.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations