1983
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140380022007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nifedipine in Hypertensive Emergencies of Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first report of nifedipine use in treatment of acute hypertension was published in 1983 by Dilmen and colleagues [108], who administered 0.25-0.5 mg/kg/dose of nifedipine sublingually to 21 children with severe hypertension and found that it reduced blood pressure by approximately one-third within 30 min. Duration of effect was approximately 6 h, and reported side effects included tachycardia and flushing.…”
Section: First-generation Ccbs: Verapamil Diltiazem and Nifedipinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first report of nifedipine use in treatment of acute hypertension was published in 1983 by Dilmen and colleagues [108], who administered 0.25-0.5 mg/kg/dose of nifedipine sublingually to 21 children with severe hypertension and found that it reduced blood pressure by approximately one-third within 30 min. Duration of effect was approximately 6 h, and reported side effects included tachycardia and flushing.…”
Section: First-generation Ccbs: Verapamil Diltiazem and Nifedipinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common mode of administration of SA nifedipine was via the sublingual route (55.6%). In children, sublingual administration is rapid, easy to administer, and effective [18,21,22,26,27,28]. However, there are adult data to suggest that the oral route has improved absorption with a less-rapid decline in blood pressure compared with the sublingual route [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are adult data to suggest that the oral route has improved absorption with a less-rapid decline in blood pressure compared with the sublingual route [24,25]. The mean dosage utilized for hypertension treatment in children in this study follows the recommended dosages of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg per dose [18,21,22,26,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limited trials in hypertensive children also demonstrated effective reduction of blood pressure after a single 0.25-to 0.5 mg/kg sublingual dose. 16 Purported advantages of nifedipine for the acute management of markedly elevated blood pressure include low incidence of hypotension, efficacy in patients with renal failure and refractoriness to other antihypertensive agents, lack of venous dilatation and orthostasis, no reduction in cerebral blood flow, and compatibility with other antihyper¬ tensive drugs. Both verapamil and diltiazem hydrochloride have also been shown to reduce elevated blood pres¬ sure, but the clinical experience is less than with nifedipine.17 Unfortunately, verapamil may have a negative inotropic effect at the doses that are required to affect blood pressure.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%