2008
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2008.8.563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nielsen type numbers and homotopy minimal periods for maps on 3–solvmanifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that A is a hyperbolic matrix; it has different real eigenvalues: one is greater than 1 and the other is less than 1. Furthermore, neither ℓ 12 nor ℓ 21 vanishes, see for example .…”
Section: The Lattices Of Solmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This implies that A is a hyperbolic matrix; it has different real eigenvalues: one is greater than 1 and the other is less than 1. Furthermore, neither ℓ 12 nor ℓ 21 vanishes, see for example .…”
Section: The Lattices Of Solmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall for example from [, Lemma 2.1] that the set of all lattices of Sol is the same as the set of all hyperbolic 2 × 2‐integer matrices with trace >2. We can refine this relation further.…”
Section: The Lattices Of Solmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finding minimal number of r -periodic points in the homotopy class (for a fixed r ) is an important challenge in modern homotopy periodic point theory, with an increasing number of valuable results obtained in the last decade in many particular cases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graff and J. Jezierski JFPTA introduced by Jiang [18] in 1983 as a lower bound for the number of r-periodic points in the homotopy class, and it was proved in 2006 that NF r (f ) is the best such lower bound, i.e., it is equal to the minimum in (1.1); see [16]. During the last decade, NF r (f ) was computed in many particular cases; see [13,14,15,19,20,21]. Recent investigations of the authors showed that the smooth and continuous theories do not coincide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%