1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-328x(00)99476-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Niedermolekulare diorganozinn-sauerstoff-verbindungen: di-t-butyl- und di-t-amylzinnoxid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the bulky 2,4,6-triisopropyl ligands, the tin atoms exhibit distorted tetrahedral geometries. The mean O±Sn±O angle in 1 amounts to 104.4(1)°, which is close to the corresponding angles in cyclot-Bu 2 SnO) 3 (106.9(2)°), [4] 3 (114.8°) [6] but somewhat smaller than those values reported for cyclo-(t-Bu 2 SnO) 3 (119.5(4)°), [4] cyclo-[(EtMe 2 C) 2 [5] and cyclo-{[(Me 3 Si) 2 CH] 2 SnO} 2 (119.9(9)°) [12]. The mean Sn±O±Sn angle in 1 amounts to 136.1(2)°which is close to the Sn±O±Sn angles reported for cyclo-(t-Bu 2 SnO) 3 [5] but bigger than the angles found for cyclo-[(2,6-Me 2 ±C 6 H 3 ) 2 SnO] 3 (120.8°) [6] and cyclo-[(Me 3 SiCH 2 ) 2 SnO] 3 (122.4(2)°) [2].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of the bulky 2,4,6-triisopropyl ligands, the tin atoms exhibit distorted tetrahedral geometries. The mean O±Sn±O angle in 1 amounts to 104.4(1)°, which is close to the corresponding angles in cyclot-Bu 2 SnO) 3 (106.9(2)°), [4] 3 (114.8°) [6] but somewhat smaller than those values reported for cyclo-(t-Bu 2 SnO) 3 (119.5(4)°), [4] cyclo-[(EtMe 2 C) 2 [5] and cyclo-{[(Me 3 Si) 2 CH] 2 SnO} 2 (119.9(9)°) [12]. The mean Sn±O±Sn angle in 1 amounts to 136.1(2)°which is close to the Sn±O±Sn angles reported for cyclo-(t-Bu 2 SnO) 3 [5] but bigger than the angles found for cyclo-[(2,6-Me 2 ±C 6 H 3 ) 2 SnO] 3 (120.8°) [6] and cyclo-[(Me 3 SiCH 2 ) 2 SnO] 3 (122.4(2)°) [2].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The 119 Sn NMR spectrum (CDCl 3 ) of 1 shows one signal at ±128.6 ppm being almost identical to the 119 Sn MAS NMR chemical shift mentioned above and very close to the 119 Sn NMR chemical shift reported for cyclo-[(2,6-Et 2 ±C 6 H 3 ) 2 -SnO] 3 (±125.0 ppm) [7]. Interestingly, the 2 J( 119 Sn± O± 117 Sn) coupling of 501 Hz is significantly bigger as compared to the corresponding coupling in the closely related diaryltin oxide cyclo-[(2,6-Me 2 ±C 6 H 3 ) 2 SnO] 3 (320 Hz), [27] as well as in cyclo-(t-Bu 2 SnO) 3 (369 Hz), [4] cyclo-[(Me 2 EtC) 2 SnO] 3 (394 Hz), [4] and cyclo-[(Me 3 SiCH 2 ) 2 SnO] 3 (335 Hz) [2]. This difference, especially in comparison with cyclo-[(2,6-Me 2 ± C 6 H 3 ) 2 SnO] 3 having an almost identical substituent pattern at tin, is likely to originate from the well established dependence of the 2 J( 119 Sn±O± 117 Sn) coupling from the Sn±O±Sn bond angle [27,28] and suggests this angle in compound 1 and in cyclo-[(2,6-Me 2 ±C 6 H 3 ) 2 SnO] 3 to be even more different in solution than in the solid state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20] 4 . The solid-state NMR spectra were measured using the same instrument equipped with a 4 mm MAS probe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The singlet at 4.60 and 4.91 ppm are assigned to substituted cyclopentadienyl ring protons. The singlet at 8.09 ppm is due to the (N≡C=CH) protons [12]. The two doublets at 7.42 ppm were observed due to the aliphatic methyl protons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%