2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/136397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NIDE: A Novel Improved Differential Evolution for Construction Project Crashing Optimization

Abstract: In the field of construction management, project crashing is an approach to shortening the project duration by reducing the duration of several critical project activities to less than their normal activity duration. The goal of crashing is to shorten the project duration while minimizing the crashing cost. In this research, a novel method for construction project crashing is proposed. The method is named as novel improved differential evolution (NIDE). The proposed NIDE is developed by an integration of the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observable that the DeLOCP with the mutation strategy of DE/Target-to-Best/1 and Hybrid DE/Rand/1 and DE/Best/1 have produced the best solution: fitness function = 3054 (with average labor demand = 13.8, maximum labor demand = 16.0, minimum labor demand = 12, and project duration = 32.0 (shift)). The optimized crew sizes and start times of all activities are [13,7,4,9,6,4,6,7,8,8,13] and [1,2,2,6,14,9,9,25,27,17,32], respectively. The optimized daily labor demand is illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is observable that the DeLOCP with the mutation strategy of DE/Target-to-Best/1 and Hybrid DE/Rand/1 and DE/Best/1 have produced the best solution: fitness function = 3054 (with average labor demand = 13.8, maximum labor demand = 16.0, minimum labor demand = 12, and project duration = 32.0 (shift)). The optimized crew sizes and start times of all activities are [13,7,4,9,6,4,6,7,8,8,13] and [1,2,2,6,14,9,9,25,27,17,32], respectively. The optimized daily labor demand is illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brest et al [24], Zhang and Sanderson [25], Qin et al [26], and Zheng et al [20] presented self-adaptive versions of DE in which novel mechanisms of parameter setting are utilized. Hoang [27] introduced a probabilistic similarity-based selection operator that can enhance the DE's selection process. Rahnamayan et al [28] put forward an opposition-based DE (ODE) which exploits the concept of opposition-based learning for population initialization and generation jumping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the calculation and determination of the structural internal forces are performed according to the arithmetic interval operations [10] and the interval optimization algorithm [11,12]. Specifically, the study determines the required internal force results of concrete beams placed on an elastic foundation, applying the hybrid mutant differential evolutionary (HMDE) optimization algorithm [13] combined with the finite-element method (FEM) to compute the interval function. From there, the author determines the range of displacement and internal force results in the beams programmed by the author on Maple.17.…”
Section: Figure 1 Beam On Elastic Foundation -Winkler Ground Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the selection operator, Hoang [57] introduced a new probabilistic similarity-based method to improve the DE's selection process, and preserve the population diversity. Wang and Gao [58] designed a local selection operator by decomposing the high dimensional problem into some subcomponents and assigning a local fitness function to evaluate each subcomponent.…”
Section: B Modifications Of the Mutation Strategy Crossover Scheme And Selection Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%