2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2021.101044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotinic receptors: From protein allostery to computational neuropharmacology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neural mechanism underlying the impairment of learning and memory in bees is due to neonicotinoids acting as antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). nAChRs play crucial roles in neuronal plasticity, brain development ( Cecchini and Changeux, 2022 ), and the formation of learning memory in honeybees ( Cano-Lozano et al, 1996 ; Grunewald and Siefert, 2019 ). Chronic exposure to neonicotinoids caused nAChR desensitization ( Mustard et al, 2020 ), altered odors encoding information ( Ohlinger et al, 2022 ), and reduced microglomerular density, which are responsible for olfactory learning and memory functions ( Peng and Yang, 2016 ; Tavares et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural mechanism underlying the impairment of learning and memory in bees is due to neonicotinoids acting as antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). nAChRs play crucial roles in neuronal plasticity, brain development ( Cecchini and Changeux, 2022 ), and the formation of learning memory in honeybees ( Cano-Lozano et al, 1996 ; Grunewald and Siefert, 2019 ). Chronic exposure to neonicotinoids caused nAChR desensitization ( Mustard et al, 2020 ), altered odors encoding information ( Ohlinger et al, 2022 ), and reduced microglomerular density, which are responsible for olfactory learning and memory functions ( Peng and Yang, 2016 ; Tavares et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…142 Insightfully, it was found that the differential binding affinity of the ligand for the open versus the closed state of the channel is able to discriminate between agonists and antagonists as predicted by the Monod−Wyman−Changeux (MWC) model. 132 In addition, it was shown that an analysis of the ΔΔG of binding (i.e., open versus closed) for seven analogues of Yoda1 by RBFE calculations yields chemical insights on the gain or loss of agonistic activity in agreement with efficacy data from the literature. The reported accuracy (<1 kcal/mol) and the potential throughput via RBFE calculations make the design of mechanosensitive channel agonists and antagonists within reach.…”
Section: Ion Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These distinct pharmacological profiles were interpreted in terms of the concerted two-state model (Monod et al, 1965) based upon a pre-existing equilibrium between the resting and active states that is differentially shifted depending on the nature of the effector [3][4][5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%