Abstract:Although functional abnormalities of the salience network are associated with schizophrenia, the acute effects of nicotine on its function and network dynamics during the resting state in patients are poorly understood. In this study, the effects of a 7 mg nicotine patch (vs. placebo) on salience network connectivity were examined in 17 patients with schizophrenia and 19 healthy subjects. We hypothesized abnormal connectivity between the salience network and other major networks (e.g. executive network) in pat… Show more
“…Similar to LEP responses, vertex potentials elicited by intense stimuli belonging to different sensory modalities (Mouraux & Iannetti, ) largely reflect saliency‐related neural processes possibly related to the detection of relevant changes in the sensory environment (Downar, Crawley, Mikulis, & Davis, ). Considering that N2 wave is mainly generated from the insula that is an interoceptive integration brain structure playing a crucial role in the salience network, as it conveys multisensory information about internal body state and external surrounding environment (Craig, ), previous studies suggested that dysfunction of sensory information processing across modalities in SCZ patients could represent an epiphenomenon of salience network dysfunctions (Alustiza et al, ; Liddle et al, ; Minichino et al, ; Palaniyappan & Liddle, ; Potvin et al, ; Smucny, Wylie, Kronberg, Legget, & Tregellas, ). The salience network is involved in detecting and filtering salient stimuli and functions to segregate the most prominent information among internal and external stimuli in order to guide behavior (Legrain, Iannetti, Plaghki, & Mouraux, ; Mouraux, Diukova, Lee, Wise, & Iannetti, ).…”
Clinical observations showed that schizophrenia (SCZ) patients reported little or no pain under various conditions that are commonly associated with intense painful sensations, leading to a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. However, this phenomenon has received little attention and its underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we conducted two experiments combining psychophysics, electroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques to investigate neural mechanisms of pain insensitivity in SCZ patients. Specifically, we adopted a stimulus–response paradigm with brief stimuli of different sensory modalities (i.e., nociceptive, non‐nociceptive somatosensory, and auditory) to test whether pain insensitivity in SCZ patients is supra‐modal or modality‐specific, and used EEG and fMRI techniques to clarify its neural mechanisms. We observed that perceived intensities to nociceptive stimuli were significantly smaller in SCZ patients than healthy controls, whereas perceived intensities to non‐nociceptive somatosensory and auditory stimuli were not significantly different. The behavioral results were confirmed by stimulus‐evoked brain responses sampled by EEG and fMRI techniques, thus verifying the modality‐specific nature of the modulation of nociceptive information processing in SCZ patients. Additionally, significant group differences were observed in the spectral power of alpha oscillations in prestimulus EEG and the seed‐based functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI (seeds: the thalamus and periaqueductal gray that are key nodes in ascending and descending pain pathways respectively), suggesting a possible contribution of cortical–subcortical dysfunction to the phenomenon. Overall, our study provides insight into the neural mechanisms of pain insensitivity in SCZ and highlights a need for systematic assessments of their pain‐related diseases.
“…Similar to LEP responses, vertex potentials elicited by intense stimuli belonging to different sensory modalities (Mouraux & Iannetti, ) largely reflect saliency‐related neural processes possibly related to the detection of relevant changes in the sensory environment (Downar, Crawley, Mikulis, & Davis, ). Considering that N2 wave is mainly generated from the insula that is an interoceptive integration brain structure playing a crucial role in the salience network, as it conveys multisensory information about internal body state and external surrounding environment (Craig, ), previous studies suggested that dysfunction of sensory information processing across modalities in SCZ patients could represent an epiphenomenon of salience network dysfunctions (Alustiza et al, ; Liddle et al, ; Minichino et al, ; Palaniyappan & Liddle, ; Potvin et al, ; Smucny, Wylie, Kronberg, Legget, & Tregellas, ). The salience network is involved in detecting and filtering salient stimuli and functions to segregate the most prominent information among internal and external stimuli in order to guide behavior (Legrain, Iannetti, Plaghki, & Mouraux, ; Mouraux, Diukova, Lee, Wise, & Iannetti, ).…”
Clinical observations showed that schizophrenia (SCZ) patients reported little or no pain under various conditions that are commonly associated with intense painful sensations, leading to a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. However, this phenomenon has received little attention and its underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we conducted two experiments combining psychophysics, electroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques to investigate neural mechanisms of pain insensitivity in SCZ patients. Specifically, we adopted a stimulus–response paradigm with brief stimuli of different sensory modalities (i.e., nociceptive, non‐nociceptive somatosensory, and auditory) to test whether pain insensitivity in SCZ patients is supra‐modal or modality‐specific, and used EEG and fMRI techniques to clarify its neural mechanisms. We observed that perceived intensities to nociceptive stimuli were significantly smaller in SCZ patients than healthy controls, whereas perceived intensities to non‐nociceptive somatosensory and auditory stimuli were not significantly different. The behavioral results were confirmed by stimulus‐evoked brain responses sampled by EEG and fMRI techniques, thus verifying the modality‐specific nature of the modulation of nociceptive information processing in SCZ patients. Additionally, significant group differences were observed in the spectral power of alpha oscillations in prestimulus EEG and the seed‐based functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI (seeds: the thalamus and periaqueductal gray that are key nodes in ascending and descending pain pathways respectively), suggesting a possible contribution of cortical–subcortical dysfunction to the phenomenon. Overall, our study provides insight into the neural mechanisms of pain insensitivity in SCZ and highlights a need for systematic assessments of their pain‐related diseases.
“…We did not find any significant effects of nicotine on resting state functional connectivity measures, consistent with our prior research in smokers with and without schizophrenia in which there was no effect of nicotine on the strength of functional connectivity between dACC and striatal regions (Moran et al 2012). However, a recent study using graph theoretical methods found enhanced nicotine-induced connectedness of the ACC in individuals with schizophrenia but the opposite effect of nicotine in healthy individuals (Smucny et al 2017). Our finding of negative correlations between right caudate activation and connectivity between right caudate and dACC/DLPFC suggests that enhanced nicotine-induced caudate activation in response to errors served as a compensatory mechanism to overcome functional dysconnectivity in the cognitive control network in schizophrenia.…”
In sum, we replicated prior findings of decreased post-error slowing in schizophrenia and found that nicotine was associated with more adaptive (i.e., increased) post-error reaction time (RT). This proof-of-concept pilot study suggests a role for nicotinic agents in targeting cognitive control deficits in schizophrenia.
“…Our laboratory has recently expanded upon this work by examining effects of acute nicotine on resting state SN connectivity and topology in nonsmoking schizophrenia patients and healthy controls (Smucny et al, 2017). The SN was extracted by independent component analysis, and peaks from the extracted network used as seeds in a functional connectivity analysis.…”
Section: Nicotinic Agonists Modulate Brain Network In Schizophreniamentioning
Patients with schizophrenia self-administer nicotine at rates higher than is self-administered for any other psychiatric illness. Although the reasons are unclear, one hypothesis suggests that nicotine is a form of ‘self-medication’ in order to restore normal levels of nicotinic signaling and target abnormalities in neuronal function associated with cognitive processes. This brief review discusses evidence from neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies in schizophrenia patients that nicotinic agonists may effectively target dysfunctional neuronal circuits in the illness. Evidence suggests that nicotine significantly modulates a number of these circuits, although relatively few studies have used modern neuroimaging techniques (e.g. functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)) to examine the effects of nicotinic drugs on disease-related neurobiology. The neuronal effects of nicotine and other nicotinic agonists in schizophrenia remain a priority for psychiatry research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.