2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotinic antagonist effects in the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus: Regional heterogeneity of nicotinic receptor involvement in cognitive function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data show that local infusions of α7 and α4β2 nicotinic antagonists (MLA and DHβE) into the dorsal or ventral hippocampus or basolateral amygdala in rats significantly impaired working memory function (Addy et al, 2003; Levin et al, 2002; Nott and Levin, 2006). In contrast, acute or chronic local infusion of the α4β2 antagonist DHβE into the dorsomedial thalamic nucleus caused a significant improvement in working memory function (Cannady et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data show that local infusions of α7 and α4β2 nicotinic antagonists (MLA and DHβE) into the dorsal or ventral hippocampus or basolateral amygdala in rats significantly impaired working memory function (Addy et al, 2003; Levin et al, 2002; Nott and Levin, 2006). In contrast, acute or chronic local infusion of the α4β2 antagonist DHβE into the dorsomedial thalamic nucleus caused a significant improvement in working memory function (Cannady et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential undesired consequence of nAChR antagonism is cognitive impairment. Conflicting evidence exists as to whether the mechanistically similar DHβE interferes with cognitive function, likely a byproduct of different cognitive domains assessed by various tasks and other procedural variations (Cannady et al 2009; Davis and Gould 2006; Davis et al 2007; Levin et al 2002; Raybuck and Gould 2009). Certainly, this area merits further examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infusions of mecamylamine to the ventral hippocampus, substantia nigra, and ventral tegmental area, but not to the nucleus accumbens, impaired choice accuracy on a radial arm maze task (Kim and Levin, 1996; Levin et al, 1994). Likewise, infusions of DHβE to the hippocampus impaired working memory (Bancroft and Levin, 2000; Bettany and Levin, 2001), but infusions to the medial thalamic nucleus improved performance on a radial arm maze task (Cannady et al, 2009). Although few studies have examined the effects of nicotine dependence treatments on memory impairment following nicotine withdrawal in rodents, both bupropion and varenicline ameliorated deficits in performance on the elevated-plus maze induced by scopolamine, a muscarinic cholinergic antagonist (Kruk-Słomka et al, 2012; Kruk et al, 2011).…”
Section: Nicotine Withdrawal and Cognitive Performancementioning
confidence: 99%